This is Gerry Albert Corpuz and this is my life and political journey to the world of class struggle and class emancipation
alex martin remollino
bagong alyansang makabayan
bulatlat
Business
Channel 2
GMA News
ilangilang
mao hermitanio
mong palatino
Philstar
pinoy top blog
roymorilla
UPI
www.inq7.net
www.yehey.com
zumel
today
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
November 2004
October 2004
bitch n pieces
chacha
civil war
corruption
debt trap
economic slavery
garb vs carp
gma resign
gma sona
human rights
manila bay
mindboggling people
mining
oil and power
peace talks
people power
rice crisis
spratly
state negligence
state terrorism
supreme court
us militarism
visited *loading* times
Recto unfit as NEDA chief, says militant fishers’ group
As far the fisherfolk activist group Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) is concerned, former Senator and newly installed National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) secretary Ralph Recto is not the right man for the job.
“We don’t want this country to be governed by someone who sees the development of the people through dole out exercises and alms giving. This will not solve the problem and will only promote begging for alms mentality, and that kind of mindset obscures the truth on poverty and the pressing need for meaningful reforms,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
“Socio economic planning secretary Recto is unfit for the job, just like President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo,” the Pamalakaya leader said. The fisherfolk leader made the remarks against Recto, after the President’s new NEDA chief on Thursday said he preferred direct cash subsidies to the poor, rather than using billions of taxpayers’ money to subsidize rice imports.
“This is Recto’s second biggest mistake. His first major crime for the 21st century is when he pushed the
approval of the anti-people Value Added Tax. Look at our people right now. They are all suffering from
extreme poverty and economic crisis courtesy of the Arroyo-Recto 12 percent VAT. Now this comebacking politician wants us to subscribe to his latest economic escapade on dole out. Give us a break,” Hicap added.
Pamalakaya said the correct political position of a decent thinking NEDA chief should be discard the
policy of dole out and mandate the NFA to use billions of public funds to procure palay (unhusked rice) from Filipino farmers rather than spend the money on rice importation. “The solution is very simple, very viable and a sure winner at the political box-office. But Secretary Recto has the same anti-poor mindset like President Arroyo. He and the President want to reduce our poor people as full-time beggars and obsessed folks on dole outs,” the militant group said.
The militant group said instead of dole –outs and direct cash subsidies, the P 32 billion allotted by
the national government for NFA this year, should go to direct subsidies to farmers in the form of
technical and production subsidies, as well as procurement subsidies to guarantee high price for
their locally produce palay.
The NFA in return, the group said, could sell the rice to the consuming public at affordable or cheaper
prices. The group said 80 percent of the country’s total population is poor, and that sound proposal
could benefit 65 to 70 million poor Filipinos all over the country.
“It is superior to the proposal of Recto to give cash dole outs to the poor. Only a few thousands of
poor people will benefit from these direct cash subsidies of the government. Unlike in our proposal,
70 million Filipinos, including the poor farmers themselves are assured of cheaper and safe rice
supplies,” Pamalakaya said.
Recto, in a press conference said cash transfers were a better way to help the poor cope with high food
prices, which had dragged down growth of the economy so far this year. “Cash transfers are a more direct way of helping the poor,” he said.
The NEDA socio economic planning secretary noted that subsidies to the NFA were well targeted to the poor because even non-poor families were able to buy NFA rice. Recto made the statement as the National Statistical Coordination Board reported in the press conference that the country’s economy measured in terms of gross domestic grew by 4.6 percent in the 2nd quarter of the year, much slower than the 8.3 percent in the same period last year.#
Pamalakaya to Revilla Sr: Dream on but not at the expense of fisherfolk and Manila Bay environment
The left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Thursday told Philippine Reclamation Authority (PRA) chair Ramon Revilla Sr. that he is free to dream and it is for free but not at the expense of small fisherfolk and poor people of Cavite and the Manila Bay environment.
Pamalakaya made the statement after Revilla spoke about his dream to develop the Sangley Point in Cavite City as international logistics hub where casinos, hospitals, call centers and recreational centers would be constructed along Manila Bay.
“We cannot stop this aging and has-been actor-politician from dreaming. But please not at the expense of small fisherfolk and poor people and the fragile environment of Manila Bay,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
The former senator and strong ally of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo said the P 200-billion Sangley Point Development Project can lead to various business establishments, and if completed could rival other major international ports in Asia like that in Singapore and Hong Kong and could generate jobs to people of Cavite.
“That’s the biggest pipe dream of a lifetime. The ambitious plans directed by his main benefactor in Malacañang in conspiracy with the business clients of the Macapagal-Arroyo administration to make Cavite as the bastion of bogus industrial and commercial development will practically wipe out, if not place all the people of the province and the Manila Bay environment under the Intensive Care Unit,” Pamalakaya’s Hicap added,
“Please allow us to state the fact that the reclamation of Manila Bay waters did not only pave way for demolition of fishing communities and destruction of livelihood, it also facilitated and enhanced the growth marine cancer in the bay,” Pamalakaya said referring to the 2,000 hectare reclamation project the PRA has envisioned to make Sangley Point a major international seaport and container terminal in Asia.
Revilla said the reclamation project is 40 percent completed. If it is finished, it would be able to host additional export processing zones, industrial, commercial, military and tourism facilities. He said the Sangley Point conversion project was a birthday gift to him by President Arroyo.
“What a gift. He is one of the luckiest guys in town having received that P 200-billion project from the most corrupt President his country has ever had,” Pamalakaya said.
Pamalakaya said close to 3 million coastal people in Metro Manila and Cavite are still dependent to fishing as principal source of livelihood, and any move to transform or convert Manila Bay for other purposes like the $15-billion casino project, the Cavite Phase II Coastal Road project and the Sangley Point Development Project will have a killing impact on the livelihood of small fishermen, aside from the fact that they would be demolished from their communities, once construction of support structures and establishments begins.
“From 1992 to 1995, the demolitions of coastal shanties became an everyday ordeal in Pasay Reclamation area. Houses were uprooted on almost day-to-day basis. Small and big time bribery to divide the communities were conducted to facilitate the demolition of coastal communities.
The setting up of casino and resorts, including SM’s Mall of Asia was all in the master plan of the government known as Manila Bay Master Development Plan that officially started during the time of President Ramos and projected to end between 2020 and 2025.
The Pamalakaya leader recalled that 3,500 small fisherfolk in Pasay Reclamation Area and another 3,000 coastal and urban poor families along the coastal shores of Parañaque were evicted by the government of former President Ramos to pave way for the construction of the proposed casino that would make the Philippines the Las Vegas of Asia. #
Anti-corruption center built in RP to remind GMA about her crimes of corruption
The left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Thursday said the first ever institution in Asia that will focus on the study and prevention of corruption will be built in the country to remind President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo about her high crimes of corruption.
“It is actually both a rebuff and a reminder to Malacañang that the world is watching President Arroyo about allegations that her government committed acts of plunder and first-rate crimes of corruption against the Filipino people,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said at the sideline of an alternative forum on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights sponsored by the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan) and the National Union of People’s Lawyers (NUPL) this morning.
“Arroyo’s Republic is a corrupt Republic. It is better that the anti-corrupt institution in Asia will be established here to study the extremely corrupt behavior and practices of Mrs. Arroyo and her ruling gang in Malacañang. We hope the anti-corruption center will act as a anti-corruption watchdog in its strict sense and orientation,” the Pamalakaya leader added.
However, Hicap said it is ironic that the Center for Asian Integrity (CAI) forged a partnership with the Office of the Ombudsman currently headed by Ombudswoman Atty. Merceditas Gutierrez, a known staunch ally of the President.
“That’s the mother of all irony. This office under the leadership of Gutierrez is not trusted by the Filipino public over allegations that the Ombudsman is protecting the President and her close associates on numerous plunder and corruption charges filed before the Ombudsman’s office since 2001,” Pamalakaya said.
The militant group filed three plunder and anti-corruption complaints against President Arroyo and other government officials.
These charges stemmed from the malversation of P 728-million fertilizer scam in that was used to finance the election campaign of Mrs. Arroyo and other politicians in 2004, the offshore mining in Tañon Strait in Central and Western Visayas and Rapu-Rapu mining in Albay province, which Malacañang allowed in 2005, and the P 130-B coconut levy fund together with business tycoon Eduardo “Danding” Cojuangco also in 2005.
Pamalakaya said Ombudsman Gutierrez did not act on these complaints because she cannot go against Mrs. Arroyo who appointed her as Chief of the Office of the Ombudsman. “It is really very ironic, very, very ironic,” the militant group said.
Atty. Gutierrez led the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding which will pave way for the establishment of the anti-corruption center. Among the programs of the center are incorporation of Ombudsman’s training center, which will train trainers, investigators and prosecutors on integrity. She said the Ombudsman Academy will be transferred to CAI center.
The center will also incorporate a research program to provide qualitative and quantitative research on corruption using international methodologies. It will also entail a curriculum and course development on integrity courses accredited by the University of the Philippines.
Ombudswoman Gutierrez said the establishment of the anti-corruption center was an indicator that the government is doing its job to control corruption. #
Leftists, Joker want overstaying US troops out of Mindanao
The left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) and pro-administration Senator Joker Arroyo on Wednesday said the overstaying US troops in Mindanao should leave the war-ravaged island.
The veteran senator criticized what the described as “overstaying” American troops in Mindanao, adding the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) has been dubbed as the Overstaying Forces Agreement because of the continuous stay of US forces in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.
This is not the first time Senator Arroyo questioned the presence of US role in resolving the peace problem in Mindanao. Earlier, the senator criticized the presence of US ambassador to the Philippines Kristie Kenny in Kuala Lumpur for the scheduled signing of stalled GRP-MILF Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain.
“Like Senator Arroyo, we demand the immediate pullout of Washington troops in Mindanao. We will not buy the military line that the American forces are there to conduct humanitarian mission for the victims of the ongoing shooting war in Mindanao. That is a flimsy and dime-a-dozen alibi to justify their seemingly lifetime stay in the South,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
The Pamalakaya leader went one step ahead by challenging Senator Arroyo to file a bill in the Senate urging the abrogation of VFA and another resolution urging the appropriate committees of the Senate to investigate the overstaying US troops. “Since he has opened his big mouth, it is time to for him to flex his political muscles against the overstaying and meddling US troops in Mindanao,” Hicap said.
“The US embassy in Manila should tell their troops in Mindanao to pack up their things and go back home. They are saying their troops are there for humanitarian mission. That is a false claim. The humanitarian aspect of war can be done by the International Red Cross and the US troops has no mandate to grab that work from Red Cross,” Hicap added.
Aside from pullout of US troops, the fisherfolk leader also urged Malacañang, the Department of National Defense and the AFP to stop its all-out war in Mindanao, particularly the escalation of military offensives in Maguindanao and North Cotabato which paved way for the rise in the casualties of war among Moro people and Christians as well.
“The government’s red carpet bombing and shooting sprees in Mindanao must be stopped. This all-out war of Malacañang must be scrapped and instead pursue the resumption of the peace talks between the GRP-MILF. The first thing that the government should do is to clear the path for the resumption of peace talks by removing US troops from Mindanao and order the AFP forces to stop the all-out war offensive,” Pamalakaya added.
Last week, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) claim that the US troops who were seen inside the military’s 64th Infantry Batallion in Datu Saudi town, which is near the Mamasapano town where government troops have been firing cannons towards the MILF lairs.
“The AFP should not tell us that the US troops are there as mere viewers of an Olympic shooting intramural between two belligerent forces. We were not born yesterday not to understand the real score in the field. The Washington bad guys are there to orchestrate, direct and participate in the puppet government’s all-out war against the MILF and the Moro people,” the Pamalakaya leader added.
Lt. Col. Julieto Ando, 6th Infantry Division spokesperson said the US troops were not directly participating in the punitive action against the group of Commander Bravo and Commander Kato with 700 followers, adding that the US troops are just part of the humanitarian team and they are barred from leaving the army camp because of the ongoing fighting.
According to Pamalakaya, when the U.S. declared Mindanao as the “Second Front” in its “War against Terror” in 2002, an undetermined number of U.S. forces have been deployed in the Moro areas. The group said in 2002, the U.S. started deploying 660 personnel based in the Joint Operations Task Force base in Camp Navarro in Zamboanga City and an additional 160 U.S. troops in Basilan for the RP-U.S. Balikatan exercises. #
Pamalakaya’s appeal for Pope to see human rights situation in RP reaches international shores
International media across the United States and Canada led by the world renowned The International Herald Tribune, the European sister company of The New York Times published the story of the militant fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) inviting Pope Benedict XVI to come over to see the true state of human rights and civil liberties in the country.
On April 20, the International Herald Tribune ran the Pamalakaya story written by the Associated Press entitled “Activists urge Pope to visit Philippines to investigate alleged human rights violations”.
The story lead was “leftwing Philippine activists urged Pope Benedict XVI to visit the predominantly Catholic country to investigate extrajudicial killings and other human rights violations.
The same story was written as breaking news written by D’Jay Lazaro for GMA News TV and Delfin Mallari Jr. of the Philippine Daily Inquirer on the same day. Pamalakaya information officer and international liaison officer Gerry Albert Corpuz said, their appeal to Pope Benedict XVI was also broadcasted in several radio stations across the United States and Canada.
Among the radio stations abroad the aired the appeal were radio stations Country 105-FM in Canada, CJob 68, AM 980, AM 900, AM 640, 630 CHED, AM 770 and 570 news in Canada and the United States, Canada East, British Columbia region radio station, Prince George Citizen radio station, Q2 Montreal News and the Canadian Press and Hamilton News Radio in Canada, the CKWS-TV in New York, the Bangkok Post of Thailand and Irrawady news of Burma and Southeast Asia.
“We hope our appeal that reached the people of the United States, Canada, Europe and Asia will merit the attention of the Holy See. President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s crimes against humanity remain an issue all over the country. Her government’s policy of extrajudicial killings and campaign of political repression of her administration and the military continue to dominate the local political landscape,” Corpuz said.
“In behalf of the human rights community in the Philippines, we thanked the international media for giving us the space to air our issues and struggles in advocating and defending the basic human rights and civil liberties of the people against the criminal regime of Mrs. Arroyo,” the Pamalakaya information chief added.
Pamalakaya’s appeal for Pope Benedict VXI stemmed from the landmark address of 81-year old German pontiff to the United Nation General Assembly who said that human rights are the common language and ethical substratum of international relations and promoting these rights is the best way to eliminate inequalities.
Pope Benedict said victims of hardship and despair, whose human dignity is violated with impunity, become easy prey to call to violence, and they can then become violators of peace. By contrast, he said, recognition of human rights favored conversion of the heart, which then leads to a commitment to resist violence, terrorism and war.
Benedict said the international community sometimes had the duty to intervene when a country could not protect its own people from “grave and sustained violations of human rights”.
“We strongly appeal to archbishops and bishops of CBCP and to CBCP President and Jaro Archbishop Angel Lagdameo to invite and convince Pope Benedict XVI to come to the country so he could listen to the voices of the grassroots people and their defenders who are suffering from state-sponsored terrorism, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances and political persecution,” Pamalakaya said.
Citing the date provided by the human rights watchdog Karapatan, Hicap said from 2001 up to April 2008, the government of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was responsible for the summary executions of 902 leftwing activists and enforced disappearance of 180 political activists during the last seven years.
Pamalakaya said Malacañang, the Armed Forces of the Philippines and the Philippine National Police under the command of the National Security Council are also engaged in fabrication of rebellion and criminal charges against top leaders of the open mass movement to effectively stop and silence them from advocating the people’s issues and basic human rights
The militant group was referring to fabricated charges filed against Randal Echanis, Deputy Secretary General of the left-leaning peasant alliance Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP). Echanis is currently detained in Manila City Jail for his alleged participation in the Hilongos killings of former communist rebels.
Pamalakaya said Bayan Muna Party list Reps. Satur Ocampo and Teodoro Casiño, Gabriela party list lawmaker Liza Maza and former Anakpawis party list Rep. Rafael Mariano are also facing charges for concocted murder cases in Nueva Ecija, which the group said was part of the campaign of political persecution orchestrated by Malacañang against critics of the Arroyo administration and the military establishment.
“Pope Benedict XVI should be informed that the Macapagal-Arroyo government and the pro-Arroyo chain of command in the military are also resorting to fabrication of criminal and murder charges against human rights defenders and advocates of genuine reforms to be able to contain them from exposing and opposing the crimes of the ruling de facto Martial Law in Malacañang,” the group added. #
Farmland as collateral bills would lead to massive cancellation of farmers’ land titles, rural groups say
Four of the biggest of rural-based organizations- the Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP), the fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya), the peasant women federation Amihan and the agricultural workers group Unyon ng mga Manggagawa sa Agrikultura (UMA) on Saturday said the proposed five farmland as collateral bills in the House of Representatives would lead to massive cancellation of land titles currently hold by farmer beneficiaries of agrarian reform program.
“The proposed five farmland as collateral bills in Congress are shotgun pieces of legislation. They are meant to re-concentrate lands in the hands of landed monopolies and deny peasant land rights all over the country,” the groups said in a joint statement.
There are currently five bills in the House of Representatives namely House Bill 32 authored by Rep. Jose Carlos Chua (3rd district, Negros Occidental), House Bill 1868 authored by Rep. Monico Puentevella, House Bill 2083 authored by Rep. Junie Cua, House Bill 2707 authored by Rep. Diosdado Arroyo and House Bill 3368 authored by Rep. Edgar Chato.
All these bills are seeking to allow agrarian reform beneficiaries to mortgage farmlands awarded to them to avail loans from banks and other financial institutions, using their land titles such as their certificates of landownership awards (CLOAs) and emancipation patents (EPs) to gain broader access to credit.
“The House of Representatives should realize that farmland as collateral bill, if enacted into law, would not provide farmers broader access to credit. They should consider that most of the agrarian reform beneficiaries (ARBs) are impoverished and bankrupt and would find it difficult to repay loans. Thus, it would lead to cancellation of the EPs and CLOAs through foreclosure of the mortgage. This would lead to re-concentration of the lands back to the hands of the landowners or the moneyed-few,” KMP secretary general Danilo Ramos said in a press statement.
Ramos said one strong argument against these bills is the fact that the data on cancellation of CLOAs and EPs is very horrible and terrifying. And the cancellation proceeds from the nonpayment of the farmers of the amortization for the awarded lands either under PD 27 or CARP.
50,000 cases pending before DAR
The KMP leader said In September 2007 DAR reported that 5,049 EPs while 103,092 CLOAs were already cancelled involving 204,579 hectares of lands. “This figure does not include pending cases of cancellation of EPs and CLOAs before the DAR. The agrarian reform department records likewise show that there are almost 50,000 cases pending before it which involves exemption, conversion and cancellation of EPs and CLOAs,” Ramos asserted.
Supporting the KMP’s claims, Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said DAR to date has not made an actual determination and inventory of how many CLOAs/EP were cancelled.
Citing a study by militant think tank Ibon Foundation, Hicap said more than 2,000 EPs and CLOAs, covering 380,000 hectares of land, were cancelled by the middle of 2004 alone. This shows a huge discrepancy with the report of DAR.
“The figures simply show that farmers could not afford to pay the amortization of the lands and it would be more difficult for them to pay the loans given their present situation. Thus, it is most certain that if ever farmlands would be mortgage, the result would be foreclosure of the mortgage for nonpayment of the loan,” the Pamalakaya leader said.
Pamalakaya stressed that farmland as collateral bill will have the same effect as section 26 of RA 6657. CARP places the burden of “owning” land to the farmers by compelling them to pay for the value thereof without however, providing for sufficient support services to them.
“In essence, the bill would allow the “second mortgage” of farmlands to persons or entities. The first mortgage is that provided under section 26 of Republic Act 6657. It would therefore only exacerbate farmers’ indebtedness, usury and landlessness,” the fisherfolk group added.
Pamalakaya said Section 26 of CARP provides that the awarded lands shall be paid for by the beneficiaries to the LBP or the landowner in thirty (30) annual amortizations at six percent (6%) interest per annum and the Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) shall have a lien by way of mortgage on the land awarded to beneficiary. This mortgage may be foreclosed by the LBP for non-payment of an aggregate of three (3) annual amortizations. Under said provision, a beneficiary whose land has been foreclosed shall be permanently disqualified from becoming a beneficiary under CARP.
“The truth of the matter is like CARP, farmland as collateral if enacted is like offering the remaining lands in the possession of farmers to the altar of bankruptcy and extreme landlessness,” the militant group said.
Pamalakaya noted that at present, a general interest rate in farmers’ loan of 15% to 35% per cropping season or a four-month period is imposed by landowners and moneylenders. There are cases, however, where interest rates more than 100% to 300% per cropping. Aside from the interest, usurers extract bigger profits from the farmers through strings of conditions tied to their money-lending business. These include cornering and under pricing the farmer’s harvest, selling of overpriced farm inputs, and renting out farm equipment at higher rates.
“With the farmland as collateral bill, the above-stated situation will not be destroyed but will be reinforced. It would legalize usury and the unconscionable conditions attached to the money lending business of the land owners and investors to the detriment of the farmers,” the group said.
GARB, not farmland as collateral or CARP revival
For their parts, UMA ans Amihan peasant women federation asserted that the Genuine Agrarian Reform Bill (GARB) or House Bill 3059 essentially has all the provisions that would answer all the needs of the farmers, not the farmland as collateral bills or the revival of the bankrupt agrarian reform law.
UMA President Rene Galang and Amihan spokesperson Zen Soriano said HB 3059 primarily seeks to break land monopoly and to achieve social justice. This can only be attained if tenants or farmers are secured in the lands awarded to them; if they can use the land according to the manner or method which they deemed best, for agricultural production; and if they are enjoying the fruits of their labor and of the land.
“If the elements of security of tenure, the right to use and the enjoyment of the fruits of the land awarded to the farmers coupled with adequate support services are all in place, then, in all probability, farmer-beneficiaries will not be tempted to sell, mortgage, alienate, or transfer the land. On the contrary, he will endeavor to make it more productive,” Galang said in an interview with Bulatlat.
“HB 3059 provides for the maximum guarantee and protection of farmer’s right to security of tenure, to the use and the fruits of his land. There is no more reason to sell, mortgage, or alienate the land, which was given to him for free in the first place,” Amihan’s Soriano added.
Atty. Jobert Pahilga, Executive Director of Sentro Para sa Tunay na Repormang Agraryo ( SENTRA- Center for Genuine Agrarian Reform), a peasant legal advocacy group said from the experience of farmers in CARP implementation, it was established that a farmer had only been compelled to enter into sale or mortgage of his land because:
1. He was obliged to pay for the value of the land awarded to him, which obligation did not take into consideration his capacity to pay and the fact that State has the corresponding obligation to correct the social injustice that was committed to him;
2. He was to provide for the daily needs of his family;
3. He needed the amount to pay the expenses for production as there as not enough support services given him;
4. He was in danger of losing the land due to non-payment of amortization or land use conversion;
5. He was or will be displaced because the land owner was allowed to retain the area he has already cultivated and made agriculturally productive.
6. The land that was initially subjected to agrarian reform was later on exempted or excluded from coverage for one reason or another.
Farmers rights’ fully secured and guaranteed under HB 3059.
To prevent any instance that would compel the farmer to sell or mortgage the land, Atty. Pahilga said HB 3059 provides the following:
Free distribution:
1) The lands shall be distributed at no cost to farmer beneficiaries (Section 8). Their amortization schedule or any balance under CARP or PD 27 is written off and the farmer-beneficiaries are deemed their full owners upon the effectivity of the Act (section 9).
2) Lands with canceled CLOAS or EPs or with pending cancellation proceedings are restored to the ownership and possession of original farmer-beneficiaries who shall be deemed full owners of the land upon the effectivity of the Act (section 10)
3) The farmer is issued, at no cost, a Title of Full Emancipation (section 11) to recognize his being the owner-awardee of the land.
4) The lands are immune from any levy on unpaid taxes and there is a provision on tax moratorium in case of failure to pay taxes brought by fortuitous event and the tax arrearages and delinquencies of lands already distributed under P. D. 27 and R. A. 6657 are written off. (Section 50)
HB 3059 is about free land distribution to the tiller which is the essence of a genuine land reform program.
Under HB 3059, the beneficiaries are under no obligation to pay anything as a condition to enter and begin working on the land; they have no more master, be it a landlord or a bank, to which they must visit every month/year to remit their payments. They can now use their resources for production or making the land more productive; to provide for the needs of their family; to send their children to school; to provide for health and medication of their families.
In such a case, farmers have freedom from fear, worries, anxieties and sleepless nights that they might lose the land one day for failure to pay the land amortization.
HB 3059 distributes the land free to the farmers not because they are mere stewards but because HB 3059 recognizes that farmers have already paid the landlords the value thereof as they have for so many years devoted their lives for the service of the landlords and to the improvement of their landholdings.
More importantly, the State, in recognition of social justice and general welfare, has the duty to improve their living conditions and for which reason it should not unduly burden the farmers of paying the value of the lands to be the owners thereof. This is to correct the social and moral injustice and inequity that farmers have experienced and suffered under the present system of our society.
Therefore, under HB 3059, it is the State that should pay landowners just compensation for the value of their lands. To unduly burden the farmers with the payment of the land awarded to them when the government has enough funds to fully compensate the landowners, which funds were only lost to graft and corruption, would run counter to the social justice provision of the Constitution especially when the stark reality shows that the horrendous situation of the farmers would result to non-payment of the amortization.
Support Services
Under HB 3059, lands are awarded to the farmers for free with the corresponding support services and their only obligation is to make it agriculturally productive. If they will do their part and for which certainly they will, they will contribute to the development of the agriculture of the country. In this sense, agrarian reform is considered to have fully served the interest of the farmers. It is on this sense that agrarian reform could very well be said to be the foundation of national industrialization. It is only under this scheme that land monopoly would truly be destroyed and social justice achieved.
To attain this, 75-80 % of the funds of GARB are devoted to support services in order to remove the grounds which compel beneficiaries to part with their lands. In addition, twelve (12) sections of the bill starting from section 53 to section 65 provides for the mechanism on the implementation of support services to the farmers.
Full tenurial security and protection to the farmers
According to critics of HB 3059, not only is the beneficiary under it a steward because the farmers are enjoined to sell, mortgage, or transfer the land, but his stewardship is even tied to his “physical ability” to directly till the land. According to their slanted and malicious interpretation, HB 3059 supposedly not only fails to provide the beneficiary “full tenurial security” over the land but even fails to provide the beneficiary “social security” and penalizes the beneficiary with the seizure of his land once he is no longer capable of physically tilling it.
Again, they are blatantly and terribly wrong on this respect.
Contrary to their supposition, HB 3059 provides for full protection and security of farmer’s tenurial right over the land.
HB 3059 provides that:
Farmers’ enjoyment of ownership rights, protection, and privileges, over the land awarded them shall commence at the moment of their identification as beneficiary of land distribution. (Section 40)
The lands covered by land shall not be subject to reclassification (section 49)
The lands are immune from any levy on unpaid taxes and there is a provision on tax moratorium in case of failure to pay taxes brought by fortuitous event and the tax arrearages and delinquencies of lands already distributed under P. D. 27 and R. A. 6657 are written off. (Section 50)
The act of land distribution shall be indefeasible except on the issue of adverse claim of another farmer-beneficiary to preferential right over the land and its indefeasibility takes effect upon the identification of the farmer-beneficiaries as beneficiary of land distribution. (Section 51) By indefeasibility in means that the act of land distribution could not be undone or the act of distribution could not be annulled.
The land shall be considered land reform zones and protected areas under section 52.
“Under these conditions, who would then think of selling, mortgaging, transferring or alienating his or her land? “ Pahilga said. #
US troops asked to leave Mindanao and
leave humanitarian mission to Red Cross
The left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Monday urged the United States government to pull out its troops participating in the annual Balikatan exercises in the war-ravaged Mindanao to prevent US soldiers from meddling in the ongoing shooting war between government forces and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).
“The US embassy in Manila should tell their troops in Mindanao to pack up their things and go back home. They are saying their troops are there for humanitarian mission. That is a false claim. The humanitarian aspect of war can be done by the International Red Cross and the US troops has no mandate to grab that work from Red Cross,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
Aside from pullout of US troops, the fisherfolk leader also urged Malacañang, the Department of National Defense and the AFP to stop its all-out war in Mindanao, particularly the escalation of military offensives in Maguindanao and North Cotabato which paved way for the rise in the casualties of war among Moro people and Christians as well.
“The government’s red carpet bombing and shooting sprees in Mindanao must be stopped. This all-out war of Malacañang must be scrapped and instead pursue the resumption of the peace talks between the GRP-MILF. The first thing that the government should do is to clear the path for the resumption of peace talks by removing US troops from Mindanao and order the AFP forces to stop the all-out war offensive,’ the Pamalakaya leader added.
Hicap issued the statement in response to the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) claim that the US troops who were seen inside the military’s 64th Infantry Batallion in Datu Saudi town, which is near the Mamasapano town where government troops have been firing cannons towards the MILF lairs.
“The AFP should not tell us that the US troops are there as mere viewers of an Olympic shooting intramural between two belligerent forces. We were not born yesterday not to understand the real score in the field. The Washington bad guys are there to orchestrate, direct and participate in the puppet government’s all-out war against the MILF and the Moro people,” the Pamalakaya leader added.
Lt. Col. Julieto Ando, 6th Infantry Division spokesperson said the US troops were not directly participating in the punitive action against the group of Commander Bravo and Commander Kato with 700 followers, adding that the US troops are just part of the humanitarian team and they are barred from leaving the army camp because of the ongoing fighting.
According to Pamalakaya, when the U.S. declared Mindanao as the “Second Front” in its “War against Terror” in 2002, an undetermined number of U.S. forces have been deployed in the Moro areas. The group said in 2002, the U.S. started deploying 660 personnel based in the Joint Operations Task Force base in Camp Navarro in Zamboanga City and an additional 160 U.S. troops in Basilan for the RP-U.S. Balikatan exercises.
Pamalakaya asks Ralph Recto to junk stupid move
New NEDA chief pressed to stop government plan to borrow $ 200 million loan for subsidies
Fisherfolk activists belonging to the left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Sunday dared newly installed National Economic Development Authority (NEDA) secretary Ralph Recto to junk the government plan to borrow $ 200 million in fresh loans from the World Bank to strengthen a conditional subsidy program which aims to cushion the adverse effects of high food and fuel prices on the poor.
“We challenge NEDA socio-economic planning Secretary Ralph Recto to make a decisive move against this silly proposal of the national government to borrow 200 million dollars from World Bank and the International Monetary Fund,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
The Pamalakaya leader made the appeal after National Treasurer Roberto Tan over the weekend announced the fresh bid of the Macapagal-Arroyo administration to secure fresh loans from IMF-WB to support the government’s short-term conditional cash transfer (CCT) scheme, which is an expanded version of previous social welfare-related loans.
Last week, the World Bank-led foreign donor community announced it would support government efforts to expand its direct cash subsidies to the poor while phasing out “less efficient programs” such as rice subsidies.
The World Bank said the implementation of a modern social protection system, the need for rice price stabilization and rice distribution would diminish overtime. The proposed funding would range from $ 150 million to $ 200 million in fresh loans from international donor agencies.
“For Secretary Recto’s information, nothing is good about this plan to borrow $ 200 million dollar from World Bank. This silly proposal must be thrown to the dustbin of history. This is another debt trap in the making, with millions of the Filipino people being offered further to the deathbed of World Bank corporate exploitation,” Hicap added.
“Secretary Recto must admit to himself that the $ 200 million fresh loan is not a modern social protection system, but a social contract of modern-day slavery. Something must be done to stop the national government from pursuing this stupid undertaking,” the Pamalakaya leader added.
Instead of securing fresh loans from World Bank, Pamalakaya told the NEDA chief to suggest to senators and congressmen to cross party lines and pass a law that would suspend this year’s debt payment to foreign and local creditors, and re-channel the budget to address the present economic woes.
“National interest dictates Malacañang and Congress to at least suspend debt payment for this year and instead prioritize the funding for pressing concerns and needs of the people. Nobody is asking Malacañang to go to World Bank and conduct puppet show to the financial lords of World Bank and IMF. Secretary Recto knows that and he should do his homework correctly,” Pamalakaya said.
Pamalakaya said instead of begging for another $ 200 million in fresh loans, Malacañang, NEDA and Congress should agree to suspend payment for debt servicing this year amounting to P 295.7 B and re-channel the funds for social services and other urgent needs of the people.
“The solution is doable, the only principal obstacle here is the lack of political will of President Arroyo, who always wants to keep her position as the no.1 puppet girl of the US controlled IMF-World Bank and no.1 money market pleaser of financial oligarchs in the world,” the fisherfolk group added.
Aside from suspending debt payment, Pamalakaya is also demanding the national government to scrap the 12 percent expanded value added tax imposed on petroleum products, water and electricity.
Pamalakaya said the government should scrap the P 54-billion EVAT collected from oil products, and as well as EVAT on power and water to substantially provide economic relief to millions of people.
Earlier, Pamalakaya sought the distribution of free NFA rice to coastal and farming communities ravaged by super typhoon Frank. The group also proposed for a monthly P 7,500 subsidy for fisherfolk owners and operators of small fishing boats across the country to jumpstart municipal fishing operations hampered by the intermittent increases in the prices of gasoline, the fish ban and fish scare imposed by the Department of Agriculture.
The group said there are about 170,000 small fishing boats across the country, which employs an average of 2-3 fishermen including the small fishing boat owner. It said a monthly subsidy would cost the national government at least P 1.3 B a month, or more or less P 4 billion for three months in total oil subsidy. #
Militants frown over MMDA chief’ stint in GMA 7’s ‘Celebrity Duets’
Cruel intentions, obsession for power behind Bayani escapade, says Pamalakaya
The inclusion of the controversial Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) chair Bayani Fernando, as one of the eight contestants in the second season of GMA 7 Celebrity Duets was not welcomed by the left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya).
“It is not only done in bad taste. This modern day Hitler and Rated-A puppet of the ruling political syndicate in Malacañang joined the singing reality show for celebrities in the name of his cruel intentions and obsession for power,” said Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
Hicap added: “This is really insulting to the collective intelligence of the Filipino people and to the tens of thousands of urban poor and struggling vendors in Metro Manila who suffered so much in the brutal hands of the MMDA chief and his principal benefactor in Malacañang.”
The Pamalakaya leader said the MMDA chair will use his stint in GMA 7 Celebrity Duets to show his human side and counter his dictator image as a result of his day-to-day demolition sprees of urban poor homes and vendors’ stalls all over the National Capital Region.
“Mr. Fernando and his army of demolition men are violating the basic human rights and destroying the hard-earned livelihood of ordinary people everyday. His singing, patented humor and tweetum politics in national TV will not erase his everyday crimes to humanity. His crimes, like that of President Arroyo will be forever etched in the memories of his victims,” Hicap stressed.
Pamalakaya earlier slammed the MMDA over its plans to help the Laguna Lake Development Authority (LLDA) to demolish 50,000 fisherfolk and urban poor families along the lakeshore towns of Rizal and Laguna provinces, and Pasig, Cainta, Taguig and Muntinlupa to pave way for the government reclamation activities and the construction of dikes and road structures.
“Fernando and his army of destroyers are targeting the poor people of Laguna Lake for summary demolition. We expect him and his men to enforce that patented millennium brutality of Malacañang and the MMDA, and that is one of the biggest battles the lake people would face in the very near future,” the group added.
The second edition of GMA 7 Celebrity Duets will start tomorrow with the MMDA chair leading the stellar cast of celebrity hopefuls that would compete for the P 1 million in total cash prize. Fernando will be joined in the center stage by seven other celebrities namely former Miss International turned actress Melanie Marquez, controversial young star Carlene Aguilar, fashion designer JC Buendia, actor-politician and TV host Joey Marquez, lifestyle TV host Cory Quirino, soccer player Philip Younghusband and chef JL Cang.
The show which will be hosted for the second time around by real life screen sweethearts Ogie Alcasid and Asia’s Songbird Regine Velasquez also presented the three judges in yesterday’s press launching of 2nd Celebrity Duets namely Tessa Prieto-Valdez, its first grand winner, concert and theater director Freddie Santo and composer and arranger Danny Tan.
Fernando who expressed interest to run for President in 2010 presidential elections revealed that his wife, Marikina City Mayor Marides Fernando convinced him to join Celebrity Duets because it is a good for exposure for the MMDA Chief. He said his exposure in Celebrity Duets will help him raise the awareness of the Filipino voting public on him as possible presidential contender in 2010. #
Kin, supporters of detained KMP leader say DoJ Secretary Gonzalez blocking transfer of Echanis back to PNP Custodial Center
Relatives and supporters of detained peasant leader Randall Echanis on Thursday said Department of Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez is blocking the transfer of the 60 year old deputy secretary general of Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP) back to the Philippine National Police (PNP) Custodial Center in Camp Crame.
“Justice Secretary Gonzalez is a certified liar and a man of injustice. During a dialogue with him two weeks ago, he told us that his office has nothing to do with transfer of Echanis from the police custodial center to Manila City Jail, and that he would ask the undersecretary of interior and local government to facilitate the request of relatives and supporters of our peasant colleague to have him move back from Manila City Jail to PNP custodial center,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap recalled.
“The DoJ secretary is a shameless political animal. He did not honor his promise to the relatives and supporters of Echanis. He has no palabra de honor,” Hicap added, after learning today that the DoJ through Senior State Prosecutor Peter Ong, State Prosecutors Niven Canlapan and Gino Paolo Santiago opposed the motion of Echanis counsels to have him returned to the PNP Custodial Center.
“Secretary Gonzalez is the no.1 puppet of the puppeteers composing the National Security Council in Malacañang. This aging and has-been politician has no balls to honor his words. He has no sense of justice and objectivity,” the Pamalakaya leader added.
Pamalakaya asserted that Echanis’ status is a political prisoner accused of fabricated crimes by an oppressive and repressive government. The group said the detained leader is being politically persecuted for his involvement in the peasant movement and people’s opposition to the brutal, criminal, militarist and puppet government of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.
“Echanis is political prisoner, but the inter agency legal group of the National Security Council wants him to be presented as a common criminal to justify his detention behind the rotten jail of the oppressive regime. The fight for his immediate and unconditional release will be a hard won battle, but we will not give up and will continue to assert his well deserved freedom,” the militant group said.
In their response to the motions dated August 8 and August 15 filed by Echanis lead counsel Atty. Romeo Capulong of the Public Interest Law Center (PILC), the government prosecutors maintained that the PNP Custodial Center is merely temporary detention center and not a regular jail as contemplated by the Rule 113 Section 3 of the Rule of court.
State prosecutors Ong, Canlapan and Santiago said Echanis wish to impress the Manila Regional Trial Court Branch 32, which is handling the case, that the KMP leader is an activist and political detainee, Echanis being a member of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines Reciprocal Working Committee, and fully protected under the Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG) must be given preferential treatment.
The government prosecutors said they beg to disagree because the KMP leader is charged for multiple murder which is common crime. They said Echanis must be prosecuted and detained like any other ordinary and common criminal. The prosecutors also asserted that it is beyond the power and authority of the Manila RTC to grant transfer of an accused by reason of a jail’s condition that is not conducive to the detainee. #
SHOTGUN APPROACH, decries Pamalakaya
Leftwing group says PNP gambling civilian lives in Mindanao by arming them against MILF
The left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Thursday slammed plans of the Philippine National Police (PNP) to distribute shotguns to residents who will join police auxiliary forces in Mindanao in the government fight against the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).
“The PNP is gambling the lives of civilians in Mindanao in the government’s all-out war against the MILF. This is not the politically correct thing to do. It will only place Mindanao under extreme and bloody situation,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
“This shotgun approach to this peace must be shot down,” the fisherfolk leader added.
PNP Chief Director General Avelino Razon on Wednesday announced his plans to distribute 1,000 shotguns to residents who will join the PNP auxiliary forces in connection with the police expanded role to participate in internal security operations against insurgents.
Razon said if the project would be successful, the PNP would order 12,000 more shotguns and have it distributed to residents who will join the PNP as backed up forces against the MILF and other armed groups in Mindanao.
“What is the intention of the National Security Council in allowing the PNP to buy and distribute arms to residents? It seems to us Malacañang wants to escalate the war in Mindanao against MILF in vain attempt to shift the public attention away from President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and serve whatever sinister agenda the Palace has in mind nowadays,” the Pamalakaya leader added.
Pamalakaya said the government is preparing the stage for the revival of military backed notorious vigilante groups in Mindanao, similar to what the military established during the 14 years of Marcos dictatorship to fight political armed groups and anti-dictatorship organizations in the island in the early 70s up to the last years of the Martial Law era.
“The intention of arming civilians is clear, and that is to revive the careers of anti-Moro and anti-communist death squads in Mindanao that proliferated during the Marcos era known for violating the human rights and civil liberties of the people like the Sagrado Corazon de Jesus or Tadtad, the Greenans, the Puluhans, the Ilagas and the Yellow Greens,” the militant group said.
Hicap agreed with the proposal of Bayan Muna party list Rep. Teodoro Casiño for the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) and the MILF to go back to the negotiating table and resume the stalled peace talks, with the respect for human rights and international humanitarian law as the top agenda of the talks to address the current results of the ongoing shooting war between the government and the Moro separatist rebels.
PNP’s Razon said the distribution of shotguns to civilians is legal and proper under Executive Order No. 546 issued last year which expands the PNP’s role in internal security operations. Under the order, the police provincial directors will determine how guns will be distributed. The police chief said those qualified to receive the guns are law-abiding citizens with no criminal records, village chiefs and barangay security forces. They will undergo training and receive allowances. #
Word war sparked by DENR chief’s polluted mind remark
Pamalakaya declares 2nd Battle of Manila Bay vs. Atienza
“Look who’s talking?”.
This was the immediate reaction of the left-wing fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) in response to environment Secretary Joselito Atienza’s statement that the criticisms made by the group against the P 100-B fund needed to restore Manila Bay to its former state were unwarranted and merely made by jaundiced and polluted minds.
“That statement is a declaration of war. If that is the case, then the Manila Bay fisherfolk are declaring the 2nd Battle of Manila Bay against environment Secretary Joselito Atienza,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
“This aging and has-been politician who found a political career by joining the league of the corrupt regime of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo wants to pick up fight with us. He is not doing his homework and has kept himself busy in attacking the victims of government’s commercialization and sell out of Manila Bay to the highest bidders,” the Pamalakaya leader added.
The DENR denied an accusation made by Pamalakaya that P 100-B for the rehabilitation of Manila Ba was not a prelude to a “money making scheme”. Vet Vitug, public affairs director of the environment department said the amount was a rough estimate given by Secretary Atienza when the Supreme Court asked him how much it would cost to bring back Manila Bay to an “ SB” classification.
Vitug said the money would be used to put up the long delayed water treatment facilities that should have been established by Maynilad and Manila Water, the two water concessionaires which have contracts with the national government.
Pamalakaya reiterated its reiteration that the rehabilitation of Manila Bay was never a priority of the Macapagal-Arroyo administration. The group said Secretary Atienza is now making day-to-day news on the need to rehabilitate Manila Bay to solicit funds from the World Bank and International Monetary Fund and other foreign donor agencies to generate 100 billion pesos in total funding.
“P 100 billion is P 100 billion. Again that is fortune of a lifetime for the corrupt regime of Mrs. Arroyo,” the militant group said. Pamalakaya said Secretary Atienza was misleading the public when it said the disposal of untreated wastes into the bay is the main reason for the deterioration of the bay.
The militant group said untreated water waste is just part of the huge problem of Manila Bay. Pamalakaya said 80 percent of all solid and water wastes come from industries and commercial establishments situated along the bay. It also said the reclamation activities of the government are also destroying Manila Bay preventing the marine life from generating.
Pamalakaya said 20,000 hectares of Manila Bay have been claimed over the years to give way to special economic zones in Bataan and Cavite, the commercial spaces occupied by the Manila Film Center, the GSIS Building in Pasay City, the Cultural Center of the Philippines and Folk Arts Theater in Manila, and the SM Mall of Asia and other commercial companies in Pasay and Parañaque City. #
Fishers group hit DA officials for dropping Spratly claim in baselines bill
THE MILITANT FISHERFOLK ALLIANCE Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Tuesday slammed Department of Agriculture (DA) Secretary Arthur Yap and Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BAFR) Director Malcolm Sarmiento for pressuring lawmakers to drop the country’s claim over the Spratlys in the pending baselines bill.
“The common position taken by the agriculture secretary and the bureau of fisheries director calling Congress to pass the baselines bill without the Kalayaan group of islands in the country’s territorial waters is consonance with the position aggressively pushed by China and not reflective of the people’s collective and national interest,” according to Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap.
“Instead of legitimizing and strengthening our legitimate political and territorial claims on the Spratly islands, these government officials are further weakening our position which has been legitimized by past and present historical accounts and national practices,” the Pamalakaya leader added.
The country has nine months left to pass a law that would strengthen the Philippines’ claim to extensive archipelagic baselines before a May 2009 deadline set by the United Nations under the UN Convention on the Law of the Seas or Unclos.
BFAR’s Sarmiento said failure on the part of Congress to enact a baselines bill will push the country to lose substantial volumes in mineral, petroleum and natural gas reserves as well as marine fishery resources. He said the country must first define its archipelagic baselines prior to making claims to a 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and another 150-mile Extended Continental Shelf (ECS), where much of the valuable resources are found.
Sarmiento said while the country’s claims over the Spratly islands are not included in the baselines bill, it does not mean the government is abandoning its claims to the Spratlys or other islands as claimed by some groups.
“It seems to us that DA officials headed by Secretary Yap and director Sarmiento are performing their roles to the hilt as de facto Filipino spokesmen of the Beijing government in connection with the controversy involving the country’s decades old claim to Spratly islands,” Pamalakaya’s Hicap stressed.
Pamalakaya asserted that the non-inclusion of Spratlys in the baselines bill and the mysterious visit of President Arroyo to China has something to do cannibalization of the pending baselines bill in Congress that removed the country’s legitimate claims over the Spratlys to pave way for the revival of the Joint Marine Seismic Undertaking (JMSU).
The group said one of the main purposes of the Mrs. Arroyo’s visit to Beijing is top inform top officials of the Chinese government that her government has decided to drop the country’s claim to Kalayaan group of islands as prescribed in the defanged baselines bill.
“With the removal of Spratlys in the baselines bill, it is now all systems go for China to conduct the biggest oil hunt courtesy of the corrupt and commission obsessed regime of President Macapagal-Arroyo,” Pamalakaya added. #
Fishers group hit DA officials over pressure to drop
Spratly claim in baselines bill
THE MILITANT FISHERFOLK ALLIANCE Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Tuesday slammed Department of Agriculture (DA) Secretary Arthur Yap and Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BAFR) Director Malcolm Sarmiento for pressuring lawmakers to drop the country’s claim over the Spratlys in the pending baselines bill.
“The common position taken by the agriculture secretary and the bureau of fisheries director calling Congress to pass the baselines bill without the Kalayaan group of islands in the country’s territorial waters is consonance with the position aggressively pushed by China and not reflective of the people’s collective and national interest,” according to Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap.
“Instead of legitimizing and strengthening our legitimate political and territorial claims on the Spratly islands, these government officials are further weakening our position which has been legitimized by past and present historical accounts and national practices,” the Pamalakaya leader added.
The country has nine months left to pass a law that would strengthen the Philippines’ claim to extensive archipelagic baselines before a May 2009 deadline set by the United Nations under the UN Convention on the Law of the Seas or Unclos.
BFAR’s Sarmiento said failure on the part of Congress to enact a baselines bill will push the country to lose substantial volumes in mineral, petroleum and natural gas reserves as well as marine fishery resources. He said the country must first define its archipelagic baselines prior to making claims to a 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and another 150-mile Extended Continental Shelf (ECS), where much of the valuable resources are found.
Sarmiento said while the country’s claims over the Spratly islands are not included in the baselines bill, it does not mean the government is abandoning its claims to the Spratlys or other islands as claimed by some groups.
“It seems to us that DA officials headed by Secretary Yap and director Sarmiento are performing their roles to the hilt as de facto Filipino spokesmen of the Beijing government in connection with the controversy involving the country’s decades old claim to Spratly islands,” Pamalakaya’s Hicap stressed.
Pamalakaya asserted that the non-inclusion of Spratlys in the baselines bill and the mysterious visit of President Arroyo to China has something to do cannibalization of the pending baselines bill in Congress that removed the country’s legitimate claims over the Spratlys to pave way for the revival of the Joint Marine Seismic Undertaking (JMSU).
The group said one of the main purposes of the Mrs. Arroyo’s visit to Beijing is top inform top officials of the Chinese government that her government has decided to drop the country’s claim to Kalayaan group of islands as prescribed in the defanged baselines bill.
“With the removal of Spratlys in the baselines bill, it is now all systems go for China to conduct the biggest oil hunt courtesy of the corrupt and commission obsessed regime of President Macapagal-Arroyo,” Pamalakaya added. #
President Arroyo told: Do a Musharraf
Leaders of the left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) asked President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo to follow the footsteps of controversial Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf who resigned on Monday after nine years in power to avoid the threat of impeachment.
“President Gloria Macapagal- Arroyo is Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf trapped in a woman’s body. She should resign like her male counterpart in Pakistan to allow the Filipino people to recover from scores of high crimes like political killings, rated A corruption and class A puppetry,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
In an emotional televised address, President Musharraf said he decided to resign because of his assessment of the present situation and upon the advice of his legal advisers and political allies. The former army chief, who seized power in a bloodless coup in 1999 was under heavy pressure from the governing coalition to step down before it launched the first impeachment proceedings since 1947.
In November 2007, Musharraf imposed a state of emergency to force his re-election to another five-year term through the Supreme Court, but his so-called fresh mandate is threatened by the dominance of the opposition who won majority of the seats in Pakistani parliament, and capable of throwing him out of power.
The Pamalakaya leader said both Arroyo and Musharraf have a lot of similarities. Hicap said like the Pakistani President, Mrs. Arroyo does not enjoy the support of the majority of the people and the country’s military and police.
Hicap said like Musharraf, President Arroyo is accused in many counts of high crimes of corruption, election irregularities, crimes against humanity that stemmed from political killings and grave human rights abuses committed by the military and police loyal to Malacañang, gross violation and desecration of the 1987 Constitution and grave abuse of power and misconduct.
“Musharraf is to Pakistan as to Arroyo is to the Philippines. That’s one way of correctly addressing this political equation,” Pamalakaya said. The militant group refused to buy the statement of Malacañang that President Arroyo is going to step down in 2010 and that she was only after a surgical amendment to the 1987 Constitution to allow the proposed creation of 11 federal states including the Bangsamoro homeland.
“Once the charter is open for revision, Arroyo and her loyal congressmen and senators will seize the opportunity to cannibalize the reactionary charter and make it worse to the advantage of power obsessed President and her equally power starved allies in the Senate and House of Representatives,” Pamalakaya said.
This fear was confirmed by La Union Rep. Victor Ortega who last week said that President Arroyo’s allies in the House of Representatives will pursue term extension for the Chief Executive, once the Senate and the House agree to convene into a Constituent Assembly to discuss the proposed shift of government from presidential to federalism.
Another Arroyo ally, Quezon Rep. Danilo Suarez said, aside from extending the term of President Arroyo, the term of congressmen would also be extended from three years to five years in case majority of congressmen decided to push their own term extension once both chambers of Congress convened into a constituent assembly to effect Charter Change. #
GRP, not NGOs should talk with MILF on Mindanao peace process
Leaders of the left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) lambasted President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo over her proposal for non-government peace advocates to lead in public discussions on the Mindanao peace process.
“What kind of political game plan is this? President Arroyo is the principal of the GRP which is the other party in the peace talks. Therefore she should be in the forefront of the talks with the MILF. The NGOs do not represent the US-backed puppet government of Mrs. Arroyo,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
“It seems to us Mrs. Arroyo wants to tap the services of NGOs to represent Malacañang in its proxy war and proxy peace talks with MILF in exchange for something. The MILF is a belligerent movement and therefore deserves the GRP peace panel in the negotiating table and all aspects of the peace process including the campaign for public information dissemination,” the Pamalakaya leader added.
Hicap said President Arroyo should candidly admit through the GRP peace panel that her government was not sincere in granting genuine autonomy to the Moro people and that her government’s purpose in supposedly signing the Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain was part of a general design and calculated action to outmaneuver and derail the MILF and the Bangsamoro people aspiration for self-determination.
“What will these NGOs do? Tell and convince the public that the MOA on ancestral domain is just a piece of paper as asserted by Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita, GRP peace adviser Hermogenes Esperon Jr. and Press Secretary Jesus Dureza, and that the pact on ancestral domain is still subject to government laws, further legislation and amendments, and on one hand make MILF the bad guys in the eyes of the uninformed and misled public?”, Pamalakaya said.
Secretary Ermita over the weekend mentioned the two NGOs which could help the government in addressing the peace process in Mindanao namely the Christians-Muslims for Peace and the Philippine Council for Islam and Democracy.
Pamalakaya admitted that they do not know these NGOs mentioned by Malacañang, but still advised the groups to be extra, extra careful in dealing with Malacañang, the US government and the US Embassy in Manila and the US State Department in case they decide to accept the offer of the Arroyo government.
“Malacañang and company should not be trusted. We hope these NGOs will think over a million times before accepting the tempting offer of the US puppet government,” the group warned.
Earlier, Pamalakaya asked lawmakers from both houses of Congress to undertake an all-out probe on the alleged role of the United States government in the peace negotiation between the GRP and the MILF.
Pamalakaya appealed to Congress top leaders Senate President Manuel Villar and House Speaker Prospero Nograles Jr. to conduct a joint or separate congressional inquiry that would look into the alleged direct intervention of Washington in the peace process between the government and the Moro separatist movement.
‘The US did not act as third party facilitator to the GRP-MILF peace talks. It went beyond to what is politically and morally accepted. First they used the US peace non-government organization to front act for top US officials. As the peace talks progresses, Washington political players took the front seat courtesy of Malacañang,” it said.
Pamalakaya said President Arroyo is guilty of treason for allowing the US government through the US Institute for Peace to intervene in the peace talks. The Pamalakaya leader also said Mrs. Arroyo committed an impeachable offense.
Bayan said based on the report of the US Institute for Peace, US President George Bush and President Arroyo supported the US peace NGO program known as the Philippine Facilitation Project. The report said there were three meetings held between the officials of US Institute for Peace with President Arroyo, one in 2004 and two in 2004.
According to US Institute for Peace report, the US government divided its work between the peace NGO, the USAID and the US embassy and the US State Department. The US Embassy role in t he peace talks between the GRP and the MILF is to encourage the Philippine government to pursue the peace talks. The USAID will take charge of the economic development, while US Institute for Peace was tasked to engage and influence key players in the peace process. #
DENR chief pressed to reveal P 100-B Manila Bay rehabilitation project
Saying there were not informed about the master plan of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) about the P 100-B Manila Bay rehabilitation project, the left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Wednesday pressed environment Secretary Joselito Atienza to reveal details of the ambitious undertaking that seeks to restore one of the country’s major fishing grounds to its healthy state.
“This is the first time we got across with this P 100-B Manila Bay rehabilitation project. We demand full disclosure of this hundred billion peso escapade of the environment department,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
The Pamalakaya leader said their chapters in Bataan, Bulacan, Navotas and Cavite were also not aware of the P 100-billion project intended for the rehabilitation of Manila Bay. He said this is the only first time Pamalakaya leaders and members in the areas got to know that such plan exists and was already completed three years ago.
Last Tuesday, Secretary Atienza told the Supreme Court that the government needs P 100 billion to rehabilitate Manila Bay. The DENR chief said it would be impossible to clean the water in the Manila Bay as long as domestic wastes flow into the canals into the Pasig River and into Manila Bay.
The former Mayor of Manila made the statement in asking the high tribunal to reverse the decision of Court of Appeals requiring them to come up with a consolidated plan to rehabilitate Manila Bay. Atienza and other government officials also asked the Supreme Court to dismiss the original complaint the concerned citizens led by environmental lawyer Antonio Oposa Jr. filed against them more than eight years ago.
“The Operation Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy which details the projects and budget to rehabilitate Manila Bay was completed in 2005. It is now 2008 but nobody knows what this master plan is all about. It is only Secretary Atienza, the master showman of DENR who is aware that there is such a thing as P 100- B Manila Bay rehab plan,” Hicap lamented.
Pamalakaya also scored the DENR for blaming small fishermen and urban poor residents for the present poor condition of Manila Bay. The militant group said the national government has been blaming fishermen and urban poor residents over the continuing deterioration of Manila Bay.
The militant group said 60 percent of pollution entering Manila Bay comes through the Pasig River, and 80 percent of the pollution comes from industries and commercial establishments situated along the country’s major river system in the National Capital Region. Another 15 percent of the pollution that gets into Manila Bay comes from Pampanga River, which the group said, is colonized by big and small polluting factories.
“The government is blaming over fishing as a major factor in the degradation of Manila Bay. That is a flimsy and ridiculous excuse. The massive privatization and conversion of public lands and coastal communities along the bay since the Marcos dictatorship up to present administration of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo is the principal reason why Manila Bay is under the Intensive Care Unit, and suffering from environmental comatose,” Pamalakaya said.
The militant group said not less than 20,000 hectares of Manila Bay have been subjected to reclamation to pave way for the construction of special economic zones in Bataan and Cavite, the commercial spaces presently occupied by Manila Film Center, the GSIS Building in Pasay City, the Cultural Center of the Philippines and Folk Arts Theater in Manila, and the SM Mall of Asia and other commercial companies in Pasay City.
Pamalakaya said the government intends to reclaim areas in Pasay City for the setting up of $ 15-B Casino Project in Pasay City, and it is also inclined to reclaim another 8,000 hectares of foreshore areas in Cavite for the coastal road project from Bacoor to Sangley Point in Cavite City. The coastal project alone will evict 26,000 small fishermen and urban poor from their main source of livelihood and communities. #
Militants asked Congress to probe US role in GRP-MILF peace talks
Leaders of the left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Sunday asked lawmakers from both houses of Congress to undertake an all-out probe on the alleged role of the United States government in the peace negotiation between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).
“The peace negotiation and the process that was involved in the peace talks are politically sacred to parties in armed conflict. Based on accounts and what transpired during the negotiations, the US dictated its own terms to the puppet government of President through the Washington funded US Institute for Peace and that is foreign intervention to the highest order,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
Hicap appealed to Congress top leaders Senate President Manuel Villar and House Speaker Prospero Nograles Jr. to conduct a joint or separate congressional inquiry that would look into the alleged direct intervention of Washington in the peace process between the government and the Moro separatist movement.
‘The US did not act as third party facilitator to the GRP-MILF peace talks. It went beyond to what is politically and morally accepted. First they used the US peace non-government organization to front act for top US officials. As the peace talks progresses, Washington political players took the front seat courtesy of Malacañang,” the Pamalakaya leader said.
Hicap said President Arroyo is guilty of treason for allowing the US government through the US Institute for Peace to intervene in the peace talks. The Pamalakaya leader also said Mrs. Arroyo committed an impeachable offense.
For his part, Pamalakaya vice-chairperson for Luzon Salvador France supported the call of the leftist umbrella group Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan) to have President Arroyo and her top peace and military officials investigated for giving the US the political franchise to intervene in the peace negotiation between the GRP and the MILF.
But France said President Arroyo and her top officials are expected to invoke executive privilege even if the Senate or the House of Representatives agrees to investigate the matter and compel the President and other officials involved in the peace process to shed light on the alleged intervention of the US government.
“While Mrs. Arroyo and company are expected to bankroll on executive privilege as their tool to hide, if not obscure the truth, US Ambassador Kristie Kenny is expected to unleash the bankrupt power of diplomatic immunity,” the Pamalakaya leader said.
Bayan said based on the report of the US Institute for Peace, US President George Bush and President Arroyo supported the US peace NGO program known as the Philippine Facilitation Project. The report said there were three meetings held between the officials of US Institute for Peace with President Arroyo, one in 2004 and two in 2004.
According to US Institute for Peace report, the US government divided its work between the peace NGO, the USAID and the US embassy and the US State Department. The US Embassy role in t he peace talks between the GRP and the MILF is to encourage the Philippine government to pursue the peace talks. The USAID will take charge of the economic development, while US Institute for Peace was tasked to engage and influence key players in the peace process.
Pamalakaya agreed with the observations of some political experts that Ambassador Kenny was there at the aborted signing of the GRP-MILF Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain to present herself as friend of the Bangsamoro people.
“ She was there at the aborted signing to make sure US interests like plans of setting up permanent bases in Mindanao and the possible tapping of an alleged 1.9 billion barrels of oil in the areas covered by ancestral domain pact would be entertained once the Bangsamoro homeland is established,” the group said.
Rebecca Thompson, spokeswoman of the US embassy in Manila, said Kenney and the other diplomats were invited to the signing ceremony, asserting further that the US government is not a party to negotiations, and that the aborted signing was between the Philippine government and MILF with Malaysia's help. The embassy spokesperson said the US is a committed partner for peace, development, and prosperity in Mindanao. #
P 100- B fund generation campaign behind Atienza’s Manila Bay noise, says fishers’ group
The left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Saturday said fund sourcing is the ultimate motive why Environment Secretary Joselito Atienza is now talking on rehabilitation of the Manila Bay, which the group said was not a priority of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) since President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo assumed the presidency in 2001.
“All of a sudden Secretary Atienza transformed himself into crusader for the environment and called on the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank and other funding agencies here and abroad to finance the P 100-B Manila Bay rehabilitation plan. This is money making at its best,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
Hicap added: “Secretary Atienza even mentioned the problem of climate change and global warming indicating that Malacañang and the DENR are set to make an ambitious project proposal for Manila Bay rehabilitation. P 100 billion is P 100 billion and its a huge fortune for the corrupt regime of Mrs. Arroyo.”
Yesterday, Secretary Atienza called on the attention of various donor agencies to help the national government in restoring the quality of Manila Bay by providing support to DENR’s plan to put up water treatment facilities that would clear water wastes before these come out into the river and out into the bay.
Secretary Atienza said setting up water treatment facility alone would cost the national government at least P 25 billion in taxpayers’ money. He said water concessionaires Maynilad of the Lopez group and Manila Water of the Ayala group have yet to comply with their agreement with the national government regarding the setting up of water waste treatment facilities.
The DENR chief said the deterioration of the water in Manila Bay will continue as long as wastewater from houses, the domestic waste of residences continue to flow from the Pasig River to Manila Bay that connects Cavite, the National Capital Region and the provinces of Bulacan and Bataan.
Atienza said the second major contributor of Manila Bay waters’ deterioration is the proliferation of fishpens along the coast of the bay from Cavite to Bataan. He ordered the demolition of all illegal fishpens in Manila Bay starting August 26.
Pamalakaya rebuked Atienza’s theories that the dumping of untreated water wastes and the proliferation of fish pens are to be blamed for the deterioration of the waters of Manila Bay, adding that the DENR secretary is misleading the public.
The militant group said the full-blast commercialization of Manila Bay that started during the time of the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos up to the present administration of President Arroyo is the main reason why the 190 kilometer bay is on the brink of general collapse.
“Please allow us to state the real score about Manila Bay. Eighty percent of the untreated water wastes that are thrown or dumped into the bay come from industries and commercial establishments situated along the bay. The reclamation activities of the government that began during the Marcos era up to present are also destroying Manila Bay and have prevented the ecosystem and marine life to regenerate,” Pamalakaya said.
“We are not happy with the way the national government is treating Manila Bay. We are being blamed for its deterioration. Why us? We are not destroyers of natural resources and marine environment. We cannot destroy our main source of livelihood. It is impossible for us to do that, because destroying Manila Bay is like destroying our basis for existence. In fact, we are victims here,” the group said.
The militant group said about 20,000 hectares of Manila Bay waters have been subjected to reclamation to pave way for the construction of special economic zones in Bataan and Cavite, the commercial spaces presently occupied by Manila Film Center, the GSIS Building in Pasay City, the Cultural Center of the Philippines and Folk Arts Theater in Manila, and the SM Mall of Asia and other commercial companies in Pasay City.
The militant group said Secretary Atienza has given the state-owned Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (Pagcor) the environmental clearance certificate to develop the 90-hectare reclaimed casino and resort complex in Manila Bay that will begin in the third quarter of the year. Pagcor said said companies with approved proposals must invest at least one billion U.S. dollars for their projects, with initial $ 400 million investments in the first two-years.
On top of the $ 15 billion casino project to be constructed along Manila Bay, Pamalakaya said Secretary Atienza had granted ECC to the ambitious Cavite Coastal Road Project II that would involve reclamation of more than 8,000 hectares of coastal waters along Manila Bay from Bacoor to Cavite City. Reports said aside from coastal road that would link Manila to Cavite, an international seaport will be constructed and will be annexed to the revive Sangley Point, a former US military base.
Pamalakaya said close to 3 million coastal people in Metro Manila and Cavite are still dependent to fishing as principal source of livelihood, and any move to transform or convert Manila Bay for other purposes like the $15-billion casino project and the Cavite Phase II Coastal Road project will have a killing impact on the livelihood of small fishermen, aside from the fact that they would be demolished from their communities, once construction of support structures and establishments begins.
“From 1992 to 1995, the demolitions of coastal shanties became an everyday ordeal in Pasay Reclamation area. Houses were uprooted on almost day-to-day basis. Small and big time bribery to divide the communities were conducted to facilitate the demolition of coastal communities.
The setting up of casino and resorts, including SM’s Mall of Asia was all in the master plan of the government known as Manila Bay Master Development Plan that officially started during the time of President Ramos and projected to end between 2020 and 2025.
The Pamalakaya leader recalled that 3,500 small fisherfolk in Pasay Reclamation Area, and another 3,000 coastal and urban poor families along the coastal shores of Parañaque were evicted by the government of former President Ramos to pave way for the construction of the proposed casino that would make the Philippines the Las Vegas of Asia. #
Pamalakaya mulls class suit vs. Atienza over Manila Bay reclamation
The left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) threatened to file a separate class suit case against Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Secretary Joselito Atienza if he refused to stop government reclamation activities along Manila Bay, which the group said contributes to its major destruction.
“We are not happy with the way the national government is treating Manila Bay. We are being blamed for its deterioration. Why us? We are not destroyers of natural resources and marine environment. We cannot destroy our main source of livelihood. It is impossible for us to do that, because destroying Manila Bay is like destroying our basis for existence. In fact, we are victims here,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
Hicap said his group is going to consult the planned class suit against Secretary Atienza to their legal counsel and their leaders and members in Bataan, Bulacan, Navotas, Cavite and allies in Parañaque and Las Piñas.
Hicap added: “The truth of the matter is that the real culprits over the destruction of Manila Bay are the national government and its corporate clients performing anti-environment and anti-people businesses along the bay.”
The Pamalakaya leader said aside from allowing factories and commercial establishments to discharge toxic wastes in Pasig River and Manila Bay, the baywide reclamation projects undertaken by previous governments up to the present administration of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo is one of the major reasons why Manila Bay, as a major fishing ground is on the brink of death.
The militant group said about 20,000 hectares of Manila Bay waters have been subjected to reclamation to pave way for the construction of special economic zones in Bataan and Cavite, the commercial spaces presently occupied by Manila Film Center, the GSIS Building in Pasay City, the Cultural Center of the Philippines and Folk Arts Theater in Manila, and the SM Mall of Asia and other commercial companies in Pasay City.
The militant group said Secretary Atienza has given the state-owned Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (Pagcor) the environmental clearance certificate to develop the 90-hectare reclaimed casino and resort complex in Manila Bay that will begin in the third quarter of the year. Pagcor said said companies with approved proposals must invest at least one billion U.S. dollars for their projects, with initial $ 400 million investments in the first two-years.
On top of the $ 15 billion casino project to be constructed along Manila Bay, Pamalakaya said Secretary Atienza had granted ECC to the ambitious Cavite Coastal Road Project II that would involve reclamation of more than 8,000 hectares of coastal waters along Manila Bay from Bacoor to Cavite City. Reports said aside from coastal road that would link Manila to Cavite, an international seaport will be constructed and will be annexed to the revive Sangley Point, a former US military base.
Pamalakaya said close to 3 million coastal people in Metro Manila and Cavite are still dependent to fishing as principal source of livelihood, and any move to transform or convert Manila Bay for other purposes like the $15-billion casino project and the Cavite Phase II Coastal Road project will have a killing impact on the livelihood of small fishermen, aside from the fact that they would be demolished from their communities, once construction of support structures and establishments begins.
“From 1992 to 1995, the demolitions of coastal shanties became an everyday ordeal in Pasay Reclamation area. Houses were uprooted on almost day-to-day basis. Small and big time bribery to divide the communities were conducted to facilitate the demolition of coastal communities.
The setting up of casino and resorts, including SM’s Mall of Asia was all in the master plan of the government known as Manila Bay Master Development Plan that officially started during the time of President Ramos and projected to end between 2020 and 2025.
The Pamalakaya leader recalled that 3,500 small fisherfolk in Pasay Reclamation Area, and another 3,000 coastal and urban poor families along the coastal shores of Parañaque were evicted by the government of former President Ramos to pave way for the construction of the proposed casino that would make the Philippines the Las Vegas of Asia.
The militant group said 60 percent of pollution entering Manila Bay comes through the Pasig River, and 80 percent of the pollution comes from industries and commercial establishments situated along the country’s major river system in the National Capital Region. Another 15 percent of the pollution that gets into Manila Bay comes from Pampanga River, which the group said, is colonized by big and small polluting factories.
“The government is blaming over fishing as a major factor in the degradation of Manila Bay. That is a flimsy and ridiculous excuse. The massive privatization and conversion of public lands and coastal communities along the bay since the Marcos dictatorship up to present administration of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo is the principal reason why Manila Bay is under the Intensive Care Unit, and suffering from environmental comatose,” Pamalakaya said. #
Bishops asked to issue pastoral letter against Chacha
Leaders of the left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Saturday asked the influential Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) to issue a pastoral letter against Charter Change (Chacha), which sought to extend the term of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and other congressmen.
“We appeal to the archbishops and bishops of the CBCP to immediately issue a pastoral statement that would be read in all scheduled mass beginning Sunday this week. The Gospel of the people and the Church must be read all over the country in the name of collective vigilance against greedy and power starved politicians like President Arroyo,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
“The divine and moral intervention of CBCP archbishops and bishops against this evil scheme of the ruling Arroyo gangland in Malacañang is necessary to galvanize the revived movement against the revived evil scheme of President Arroyo and her allies in the House of Representatives,” the Pamalakaya leader added.
“The 117 archbishops and bishops of the CBCP must come forward and tell Arroyo and her lapdogs in the House of Representatives to quit from endorsing this very immoral and very selfish campaign for Chacha and Arroyo’s term extension,” Hicap added.
The Pamalakaya leader suggested CBCP President Angel Lagdameo to immediately issue a pastoral statement to be read during this week mass across the country, denouncing Malacañang and pro-Arroyo’s congressmen plan to push Chacha and extend the term of their political principal in Malacañang, as well as their terms from three years to five years in vain attempt to cancel the scheduled May 2010 national elections.
“President Arroyo and the congressmen of Malacañang are moving heaven and earth to extend the term of Mrs. Arroyo and benefit from the term extension escapade of the President. The CBCP must rally their flock to spoil this day-to-day obsession to power of the President and her allies,” Hicap said.
. “The situation merits the all-out anti-Chacha gospel and intervention of the CBCP. The die is cast and the archbishops and bishops must come forward to join the people’s outrage against this selfish Chacha and term extension project of Malacañang,” the militant group said.
The militant group previously asked Senator Aquilino “Nene” Pimentel Jr. and 11 other senators who signed a Senate Resolution that called for the creation of 11 federal states in the country to recall the resolution to thwart the attempt of President Arroyo to tinker the 1987 Constitution through Charter Change (Chacha).
“It is only proper for Senator Pimentel, the author of Joint Senate Resolution No.10 and 11 other senators who signed the resolution to recall their sponsorship or endorsement now that Malacañang is using the resolution as instrument to sneak its sinister game plan for Chacha,” Pamalakaya said.
The militant group did not buy the statement of Malacañang that President Arroyo is going to step down in 2010 and that she was only after a surgical amendment to the 1987 Constitution because once the charter is open for revision, Arroyo and her loyal congressmen and senators will seize the opportunity to cannibalize the reactionary charter and make it worse to the advantage of power obsessed President and her equally power starved allies in the Senate and House of Representatives.
This fear was confirmed after La Union Rep. Victor Ortega last week said that President Arroyo’s allies in the House of Representatives will pursue term extension for the Chief Executive, once the Senate and the House agree to convene into a Constituent Assembly to discuss the proposed shift of government from presidential to federalism.
Senate House Resolution No.10 signed by Senators Pimentel, Senate President Manuel Villar, senators Edgardo Angara, Rodolfo Biazon, Pia Cayetano, Juan Ponce Enrile, Francis Escudero, Jinggoy Estrada, Gregorio Honasan, Panfilo Lacson, Francis Pangilinan and Ramon Revilla Jr. called for the convening of Congress into a constituent assembly for the purpose of revising the 21-year old charter to accommodate the proposal for a government shift from presidential to federalism.
The resolution aims to change the highly centralized system of government in Manila which has brought about a spotty development of the nation when preferential treatment has been given to localities whose officials are friendly or have access to an incumbent administration.
The 11 federal states which will be created according to the Senate resolution would be Northern Luzon, Central Luzon, Southern Tagalog, Minparom which stands for Mindoro, Palawan and Romblon, Eastern Visayas, Central Visayas, Western Visayas, Northern Mindanao, Southern Mindanao and the State of Bangsamoro. #
CBCP silence on Charter Change puzzled militant groups
LEADERS OF THE LEFT LEANING fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) said they were puzzled as to why the influential Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) have remained silent over the revived game plan of Malacañang and its allies in the House of Representatives to pursue Charter Change and extend the term of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo beyond 2010.
“Where is the divine and moral intervention of CBCP archbishops and bishops against this evil scheme of the ruling Arroyo gangland in Malacañang? How come they remained silent over the past few days? The issue of Chacha and Arroyo’s term extensions are against the Church gospel for truth and justice,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
“The 117 archbishops and bishops of the CBCP must come forward and tell Arroyo and her lapdogs in the House of Representatives to quit from endorsing this very immoral and very selfish campaign for Chacha and Arroyo’s term extension,” Hicap added.
The Pamalakaya leader suggested CBCP President Angel Lagdameo to immediately issue a pastoral statement to be read during this coming Sunday’s mass across the country, denouncing Malacañang and pro-Arroyo’s congressmen plan to push Chacha and extend the term of their political principal in Malacañang.
“President Arroyo and the congressmen of Malacañang are moving heaven and earth to extend the term of Mrs. Arroyo and benefit from the term extension escapade of the President. The CBCP must rally their flock to spoil this day-to-day obsession to power of the President and her allies,” Hicap added.
Pamalakaya noted that so far among the 100 plus archbishops and bishops of the CBCP, it is only Lingayen-Dagupan Archbishop Oscar Cruz who came out in the open to assail the latest sinister move of Malacañang and its allies in t he House of Representatives.
“The situation merits the all-out anti-Chacha gospel and intervention of the CBCP. The die is cast and the archbishops and bishops must come forward to join the people’s outrage against this selfish Chacha and term extension project of Malacañang,” the militant group said.
The militant group previously asked Senator Aquilino “Nene” Pimentel Jr. and 11 other senators who signed a Senate Resolution that called for the creation of 11 federal states in the country to recall the resolution to thwart the attempt of President Arroyo to tinker the 1987 Constitution through Charter Change (Chacha).
“It is only proper for Senator Pimentel, the author of Joint Senate Resolution No.10 and 11 other senators who signed the resolution to recall their sponsorship or endorsement now that Malacañang is using the resolution as instrument to sneak its sinister game plan for Chacha,” Pamalakaya said.
The militant group did not buy the statement of Malacañang that President Arroyo is going to step down in 2010 and that she was only after a surgical amendment to the 1987 Constitution because once the charter is open for revision, Arroyo and her loyal congressmen and senators will seize the opportunity to cannibalize the reactionary charter and make it worse to the advantage of power obsessed President and her equally power starved allies in the Senate and House of Representatives.
This fear was confirmed after La Union Rep. Victor Ortega yesterday said that President Arroyo’s allies in the House of Representatives will pursue term extension for the Chief Executive, once the Senate and the House agree to convene into a Constituent Assembly to discuss the proposed shift of government from presidential to federalism.
Senate House Resolution No.10 signed by Senators Pimentel, Senate President Manuel Villar, senators Edgardo Angara, Rodolfo Biazon, Pia Cayetano, Juan Ponce Enrile, Francis Escudero, Jinggoy Estrada, Gregorio Honasan, Panfilo Lacson, Francis Pangilinan and Ramon Revilla Jr. called for the convening of Congress into a constituent assembly for the purpose of revising the 21-year old charter to accommodate the proposal for a government shift from presidential to federalism.
The resolution aims to change the highly centralized system of government in Manila which has brought about a spotty development of the nation when preferential treatment has been given to localities whose officials are friendly or have access to an incumbent administration.
The 11 federal states which will be created according to the Senate resolution would be Northern Luzon, Central Luzon, Southern Tagalog, Minparom which stands for Mindoro, Palawan and Romblon, Eastern Visayas, Central Visayas, Western Visayas, Northern Mindanao, Southern Mindanao and the State of Bangsamoro. #
Leftists ask US envoy to explain why she was at aborted ancestral domain pact signing
The left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Thursday said US ambassador to the Philippines Kristie Kenny should explain why she was at the aborted signing of the GRP-MILF Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on Ancestral Domain.
“That’s the $ 64 dollar question Ambassador Kenny should answer with all political, moral and intellectual honesty. We don’t need her psy war tweetum remarks, what the Filipino people is a straight forward and aboveboard response,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
“Everybody knows why she was there during the aborted signing. It has something to do with the US massive hunt for oil resources and military basing agenda in the South, particularly in areas covered by the ancestral domain pact. Anyway, she is still obliged to open her big mouth and tell the truth and nothing but the truth,” Hicap added.
“It seems to us that a lot of vested interests including those of Malacañang people and Washington wanted to exploit the legitimate cause of the Bangsamoro people for self-determination,” he added.
The Pamalakaya leader made the inquiry after administration Sen. Joker Arroyo said the bigger question on the aborted signing of MOA on ancestral domain last week was the presence of Ambassador Kenny. The veteran lawmaker said the US envoy there to represent Washington’s interests in the aborted signing of the controversial ancestral domain agreement that would lead to the creation of Bangsamoro Juridical Entity (BJE).
Senator Arroyo lamented that nobody has asked the question of why Ambassador Kenny was present during the aborted signing of the ancestral domain pact between the Philippine government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). Arroyo said the United States government does not participate in any affair without thinking it over.
The senator said the supposed signing was not a simple ribbon cutting for the opening of a flower shop, raising further speculations that the US envoy to the Philippines was at the aborted signing to advance US interests in the Bangsamoro homeland.
“Washington and Ambassador of Kenny are not friends of the Bangsamoro people, as well as Japanese ambassador to the Philippines Makoto Katsura and Australian Ambassador to RP Rod Smith. These big guns of global politics are after something big, yet sinister in character and orientation,” Hicap added.
Pamalakaya agreed with the observations of some political experts that Ambassador Kenny was there to make sure US interests like plans of setting up permanent bases in Mindanao and the possible tapping of an alleged 1.9 billion barrels of oil in the areas covered by ancestral domain pact would be entertained once the Bangsamoro homeland is established.
Rebecca Thompson, spokeswoman of the US embassy in Manila, said Kenney and the other diplomats were invited to the signing ceremony, asserting further that the US government is not a party to negotiations, and that the aborted signing was between the Philippine government and MILF with Malaysia's help. The embassy spokesperson said the US is a committed partner for peace, development, and prosperity in Mindanao. #
DENR chief pressed to reveal P 100-B Manila Bay rehabilitation project
Saying there were not informed about the master plan of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) about the P 100-B Manila Bay rehabilitation project, the left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Wednesday pressed environment Secretary Joselito Atienza to reveal details of the ambitious undertaking that seeks to restore one of the country’s major fishing grounds to its healthy state.
“This is the first time we got across with this P 100-B Manila Bay rehabilitation project. We demand full disclosure of this hundred billion peso escapade of the environment department,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
The Pamalakaya leader said their chapters in Bataan, Bulacan, Navotas and Cavite were also not aware of the P 100-billion project intended for the rehabilitation of Manila Bay. He said this is the only first time Pamalakaya leaders and members in the areas got to know that such plan exists and was already completed three years ago.
Last Tuesday, Secretary Atienza told the Supreme Court that the government needs P 100 billion to rehabilitate Manila Bay. The DENR chief said it would be impossible to clean the water in the Manila Bay as long as domestic wastes flow into the canals into the Pasig River and into Manila Bay.
The former Mayor of Manila made the statement in asking the high tribunal to reverse the decision of Court of Appeals requiring them to come up with a consolidated plan to rehabilitate Manila Bay. Atienza and other government officials also asked the Supreme Court to dismiss the original complaint the concerned citizens led by environmental lawyer Antonio Oposa Jr. filed against them more than eight years ago.
“The Operation Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy which details the projects and budget to rehabilitate Manila Bay was completed in 2005. It is now 2008 but nobody knows what this master plan is all about. It is only Secretary Atienza, the master showman of DENR who is aware that there is such a thing as P 100- B Manila Bay rehab plan,” Hicap lamented.
Pamalakaya also scored the DENR for blaming small fishermen and urban poor residents for the present poor condition of Manila Bay. The militant group said the national government has been blaming fishermen and urban poor residents over the continuing deterioration of Manila Bay.
The militant group said 60 percent of pollution entering Manila Bay comes through the Pasig River, and 80 percent of the pollution comes from industries and commercial establishments situated along the country’s major river system in the National Capital Region. Another 15 percent of the pollution that gets into Manila Bay comes from Pampanga River, which the group said, is colonized by big and small polluting factories.
“The government is blaming over fishing as a major factor in the degradation of Manila Bay. That is a flimsy and ridiculous excuse. The massive privatization and conversion of public lands and coastal communities along the bay since the Marcos dictatorship up to present administration of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo is the principal reason why Manila Bay is under the Intensive Care Unit, and suffering from environmental comatose,” Pamalakaya said.
The militant group said not less than 20,000 hectares of Manila Bay have been subjected to reclamation to pave way for the construction of special economic zones in Bataan and Cavite, the commercial spaces presently occupied by Manila Film Center, the GSIS Building in Pasay City, the Cultural Center of the Philippines and Folk Arts Theater in Manila, and the SM Mall of Asia and other commercial companies in Pasay City.
Pamalakaya said the government intends to reclaim areas in Pasay City for the setting up of $ 15-B Casino Project in Pasay City, and it is also inclined to reclaim another 8,000 hectares of foreshore areas in Cavite for the coastal road project from Bacoor to Sangley Point in Cavite City. The coastal project alone will evict 26,000 small fishermen and urban poor from their main source of livelihood and communities. #
Pimentel, 11 other senators asked to recall joint resolution
on federalism to thwart Arroyo’s charter change
The left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Wednesday asked opposition senator Aquilino “Nene” Pimentel Jr. and 11 other senators who signed a Senate Resolution that called for the creation of 11 federal states in the country to recall the resolution to thwart the attempt of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo to tinker the 1987 Constitution through Charter Change (Chacha).
“It is only proper for Senator Pimentel, the author of Joint Senate Resolution No.10 and 11 other senators who signed the resolution to recall their sponsorship or endorsement now that Malacañang is using the resolution as instrument to sneak its sinister game plan for Chacha,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
The Pamalakaya leader made the appeal a day after Malacañang announced its campaign to revise the 1987 Constitution to legitimize the change in the form of government from presidential to federalism. Press Secretary Jesus Dureza said Malacañang is supporting the Senate Resolution that called for the creation of 11 federal states across the country that includes the controversial Bangsamoro Juridical Entity.
“Mrs. Arroyo’s political survival and her obsession to remain in power beyond 2010 as Prime Minister is the ultimate reason why she and her political lieutenants are calling for Chacha. Everybody knows and the senators are very much aware of this game plan of the Arroyo ruling club” Hicap added.
Pamalakaya theorized that while President Arroyo will not run for President in 2010, there’s one way which she may exploit and that is to run as district representative of Pampanga and be elected as Prime Minister once voted by the pro-Arroyo dominated House of Representatives.
The militant group did not buy the statement of Malacañang that President Arroyo was only after a surgical amendment to the 1987 Constitution because once the charter is open for revision, Arroyo and her loyal congressmen and senators will seize the opportunity to cannibalize the reactionary charter and make it worse to the advantage of power obsessed President and her equally power starved allies in the Senate and House of Representatives.
“Mrs. Arroyo has found an opening in Senate Resolution No. 10 to vigorously pursue her Chacha and her dream to become the country’s Prime Minister. Once the reactionary charter is opened for revision, Arroyo and her allies in Congress would do the job to assure her political game plan in 2010 and beyond,” the militant group said.
Senate House Resolution No.10 signed by Senators Pimentel, Senate President Manuel Villar, senators Edgardo Angara, Rodolfo Biazon, Pia Cayetano, Juan Ponce Enrile, Francis Escudero, Jinggoy Estrada, Gregorio Honasan, Panfilo Lacson, Francis Pangilinan and Ramon Revilla Jr. called for the convening of Congress into a constituent assembly for the purpose of revising the 21-year old charter to accommodate the proposal for a government shift from presidential to federalism.
The resolution aims to change the highly centralized system of government in Manila which has brought about a spotty development of the nation when preferential treatment has been given to localities whose officials are friendly or have access to an incumbent administration.
The 11 federal states which will be created according to the Senate resolution would be Northern Luzon, Central Luzon, Southern Tagalog, Minparom which stands for Mindoro, Palawan and Romblon, Eastern Visayas, Central Visayas, Western Visayas, Northern Mindanao, Southern Mindanao and the State of Bangsamoro. #
ASEAN oil security pact needs Senate OK, militant group insists
The militant fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Monday said the Asean Petroleum Security Agreement (Apsa) is a regional wide agreement among members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) that needs concurrence of the Philippine Senate.
“Malacañang is constitutionally, legally and politically obliged to submit the draft to the Senate once it signed the oil security pact during the Asean summit in Bangkok this December. It should not treat the pact as another executive agreement and clinch the oil agreement in accordance with their own narrow and sinister agenda,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
Department of Energy (DoE) Secretary Angelo Reyes who attended the recently concluded 26th Asean Ministers on Energy Meeting in Bangkok said energy ministers of Asean have approved the draft of the oil pact that would assure the region of an oil supply in the event of shortage.
The Apsa signed by energy ministers of Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei and the Philippines states that in case of a 10-percent shortfall in the supply of oil, member countries would agree to sell their oil at friendship prices to any Asean member that is facing shortage or tight supply of petroleum products.
At the same time, the Asean oil pact called on the private sector to engage in energy exploration in the region, where energy companies based in Asean nations could infuse more cash for oil and gas exploration and actively participate in joint ventures to search for untapped energy resources in the region.
“Is it really an oil security pact for the benefit of oil lacked Asean nations or a manipulative measure to put premium to left and right awarding of service contracts in the Philippines and all over the region to offshore mining companies conducting archipelagic wide oil and gas explorations? Hicap said.
The Pamalakaya leader theorized that Apsa is meant to promote offshore mining in the Philippines and in other members of Asean and justify their dependence to global oil monopolies under the guise of promoting alternative source of energy and climate change.
Hicap said foreign exploration groups such as NorAsia of Australia, Japex of Japan, Premium Oil of The Netherlands, ExxonMobil of the United States and other big oil companies are conducting oil and gas explorations in the Philippines to detriment of fisherfolk livelihood and the marine environment.
In Cebu-Bohol Strait and the eastern part of the Visayan basin, NorAsia will conduct offshore mining in the 445,000 hectare off the strait and the Leyte Sea, while Premium Oil of The Netherlands is eying the Ragay Gulf encompassing the provinces of Quezon, Camarines Sur, Camarines Norte and portions of Albay province.
Pamalakaya said prior to the Apsa, the Philippine government had already signed another agreement which is the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on the Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipeline (TAGP) with Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam on July 5, 2002 in Bali, Indonesia. Former Department of Energy Secretary Vincent Perez signed the agreement in behalf of the Macapagal-Arroyo government.
In the agreement, the Philippine government is compelled to allow the construction of an ambitious gas pipeline from Palawan to East Natuna, Sabah, Malaysia. Pamalakaya said the gas pipeline would line the Philippines through Palawan and Malaysia through East Natuna.
Pamalakaya said the Palawan-Malaysia gas pipeline project will go as far as 1,540 kilometers, with the gas pipeline measuring 42 inches in diameter. The cost of the gas line project between the Philippines and Malaysia would amount to $ 3.036 B. The project would start this year and would be completed in 2015.
Pamalakaya said other pipelines to be constructed are the Malaysia-Thailand gas pipeline, the Indonesia-Singapore gas pipeline and the Myanmar-Thailand gas pipeline. Hicap said Singapore is also eying its own gas pipeline that would connect the Philippines through the Camago in Palawan.
According to the eight-page MoU document obtained by Pamalakaya, the agreement was signed on July 5, 2002 in Bali, Indonesia by Abdul Rahman Taib, Brunei’s Minister of Industry and Primary Resources, Suy Sem, Cambodian Minister for Industry, Mines and Energy, Purnomo Yusgiantoro, Indonesian Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Nam Viyaketh, Laos’ Deputy Minister of Industry and Handicraft, Leo Moggie, Malaysian Minister of Energy, Communications and Multimedia, Brig. General Lun Thi, Myanmar Minister of Energy, Raymond Lim Siang Keat, Singapore Minister of Foreign Affairs, Phongthep Thepkanjana, Minister to the Prime Minister office of Thailand, Dang Vu Chu, Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and former Department of Energy secretary Vincent Perez Jr. for the Philippine government.
The MOU states, “realizing that energy self-sufficiency can be achieved through national and multinational efforts geared towards indigenous energy resource exploration, development, exploitation, distribution and transportation, and undertaken in a manner that both conserves the resources and preserves the environment and human habitat.”
The MOU, which is consistent with the vision of the ASEAN countries to promote energy cooperation in the region, was first tackled on June 24, 1986 in Manila when members of ASEAN forged an agreement on energy cooperation, followed by the ASEAN Energy Cooperation in Bangkok on Dec. 15, 1995.
The TAGP is a specific energy program approved in Hanoi, Vietnam and was endorsed by ASEAN heads of state December 16, 1998. On July 3, 1999, the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation from 1999-2004 was approved, and it entrusted the responsibility of implementing the TAGP to the ASEAN council on Petroleum (ASCOPE). In 2002, the final MOU on gas pipeline projects across ASEAN was signed by its member states.
The objective of the gas pipeline project is to provide a broad framework for ASEAN member countries to cooperate towards the realization of the TAGP project to help ensure greater regional energy security.
The MOU for gas pipeline projects task all member countries to establish cooperation in various aspects such as individual and joint studies, and to support or encourage the production, utilization, distribution, marketing and sale of natural gas among ASEAN member nations.
Pamalakaya said ASEAN nations have virtually opened the floodgates for economic plunder by big gas and oil monopolies when it announced that funding would be secured from the private sector that has the means and technology to explore and extract the rich gas resources still abundant in Southeast Asian region.
“It is a sell out. In fact, this corporate prey was probably used by the Philippine government to sign the JMSU and sold its stake in the disputed Spratly Islands, including its own territory like Palawan, which is incidentally the object of the Palawan-Malaysia gas pipeline project,” the militant group said.
The agreement also recognizes the role to be played by the private sector in developing gas pipelines, including its financing and construction, and the supply, transportation and distribution of natural gas to member countries. The TAGP promotes the open access principle including management of pipelines according to internationally accepted rules as set by established oil and gas industries all over the world.
The MoU on TAGP also encourage exemption of export and import tax duties, lower or free transit fee, tax duties or other taxes imposed by the government, including charges on construction, operation and maintenance of pipelines as well as the natural gas in transit.#
“People Power” needed to frustrate Chacha resurrection, says leftist group
The militant fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Tuesday said the Filipino people should ready the battle tested People Power as their political instrument to frustrate the move of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo to revive Charter Change to perpetuate herself to power beyond 2010.
“Mrs. Arroyo’s resurrection of Charter Change deserves the people’s outrage in the tradition of People Power 1 and People Power 2 uprisings. That’s one way of stopping this ambitious, brutal and corrupt politician in Malacañang,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
The Pamalakaya leader added: “President Arroyo is gearing of an all out war for Chacha in the name of her political survival. The thick face President wants her obsession to become the Washington-backed Prime Minister puppet in Southeast Asia a political reality of the 21st century.”
President Arroyo yesterday told visiting Swiss President Pascal Couchepin that she advocates federalism as way to ensure long-lasting peace in Mindanao. This was the first time the Chief Executive talked about a shift from the presidential form of government to federalism since the Supreme Court thwarted the People’s Initiative mode as a mean to effect changes in the 1987 Constitution in October 2006.
While President Arroyo did not mention Chacha in her discussion with Couchepin, her Press Secretary Jesus Dureza said the proposed federal form of government needs the amendment of the 21 year old charter.
Secretary Dureza said the President is calling for constitutional amendment in order to carry out the shift in the form of government from presidential to federalism and to legitimize the Bangsamoro Juridical Entity governing the Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). The Supreme Court last week issued a Temporary Restraining Order that halted the supposed signing of MOA in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hicap rebuked a previous Malacañang statement that President Arroyo was only after a surgical amendment to the 1987 Constitution in order to legalize the MOA on Ancestral Domain expanding the areas covered by the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM).
“Now the real score is revealed. President Arroyo and her ruling gangland in Malacañang merely exploited the just cause of the Moro people for self-determination to advance their sinister agenda which is Chacha and make Mrs. Arroyo the longest serving US lapdog in the Palace under the new tag of Prime Minister,” Pamalakaya’s Hicap said.
Meanwhile, the militant group called on all Mindanao congressmen led by House Speaker Prospero Nograles to denounce the ongoing all-out military operations in North Cotabato and order the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) to recall government forces in the war-battered province.
“It is time for the Speaker of the House to speak on behalf of the people, not on behalf of Mrs. Arroyo and her war freak security and military officials. This is the time to say no to Malacañang, to the AFP and to the National Security Council,” Pamalakaya said. The militant group lamented that House Speaker Nograles failed to show any sign of concern. “The top leader of the House watches how the military staged their carpet bombings in North Cotabato as if he is watching and enjoying the fireworks display during the opening ceremony of the 2008 Beijing Olympic
Officials in North Cotabato said fear of getting caught in the crossfire forced thousands of villagers to abandon their homes in recent day and the number of internal refugees in the province had already swelled to 130,000 people. #
Pamalakaya: “Palace kept Asean pact on gas pipeline secret from Senate”
The militant fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Sunday said Malacañang Palace hide from senators an agreement it signed with ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) countries concerning a specific energy program that would allow the setting up of gas pipelines among neighbor counties. ]
Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap was referring to the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on the Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipeline (TAGP) the Philippine government signed with Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam on July 5, 2002 in Bali, Indonesia. Former Department of Energy Secretary Vincent Perez signed the agreement in behalf of the Macapagal-Arroyo government.
“Article 8, section 2 of the MOU clearly stipulates that this memorandum of understanding is subject to ratification or acceptance by all the member countries, and that the instrument of ratification or acceptance shall be deposited with the secretary general of ASEAN who shall promptly inform each member country of such deposit,” the Pamalakaya leader said.
Hicap added: “The senators of the Republic should have been notified and advised that such MOU on gas pipeline agreement exists and it needs concurrence of the Senate because the nature of the agreement is a regional treaty therefore subject of ratification. But President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and company intentionally kept this away from the scrutiny and approving authority of the Senate for undisclosed reasons.”
In the agreement, the Philippine government is compelled to allow the construction of an ambitious gas pipeline from Palawan to East Natuna, Sabah, Malaysia. Pamalakaya said the gas pipeline would line the Philippines through Palawan and Malaysia through East Natuna.
Pamalakaya said the Palawan-Malaysia gas pipeline project will go as far as 1,540 kilometers, with the gas pipeline measuring 42 inches in diameter. The cost of the gas line project between the Philippines and Malaysia would amount to $ 3.036 B. The project would start this year and would be completed in 2015.
Pamalakaya said other pipelines to be constructed are the Malaysia-Thailand gas pipeline, the Indonesia-Singapore gas pipeline and the Myanmar-Thailand gas pipeline. Hicap said Singapore is also eying its own gas pipeline that would connect the Philippines through the Camago in Palawan.
“Nothing has been said about this ambitious gas pipeline project. It remains a national confidential project on the part of President Arroyo and her top officials. The people were kept uninformed and the Senate, the ratifying authority has not been advised that such monumental project exists that has serious implications to the nation’s sovereignty and patrimony,” Pamalakaya said.
The group added:” If there’s nothing wrong about this project, why would President Arroyo keep this project like a big, big secret? We smell something fishy here, as fishy as Joint Marine Seismic Undertaking.”
According to the eight-page MoU document obtained by Pamalakaya, the agreement was signed on July 5, 2002 in Bali, Indonesia by Abdul Rahman Taib, Brunei’s Minister of Industry and Primary Resources, Suy Sem, Cambodian Minister for Industry, Mines and Energy, Purnomo Yusgiantoro, Indonesian Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Nam Viyaketh, Laos’ Deputy Minister of Industry and Handicraft, Leo Moggie, Malaysian Minister of Energy, Communications and Multimedia, Brig. General Lun Thi, Myanmar Minister of Energy, Raymond Lim Siang Keat, Singapore Minister of Foreign Affairs, Phongthep Thepkanjana, Minister to the Prime Minister office of Thailand, Dang Vu Chu, Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and former Department of Energy secretary Vincent Perez Jr. for the Philippine government.
The MOU states, “realizing that energy self-sufficiency can be achieved through national and multinational efforts geared towards indigenous energy resource exploration, development, exploitation, distribution and transportation, and undertaken in a manner that both conserves the resources and preserves the environment and human habitat.”
The MOU, which is consistent with the vision of the ASEAN countries to promote energy cooperation in the region, was first tackled on June 24, 1986 in Manila when members of ASEAN forged an agreement on energy cooperation, followed by the ASEAN Energy Cooperation in Bangkok on Dec. 15, 1995.
The TAGP is a specific energy program approved in Hanoi, Vietnam and was endorsed by ASEAN heads of state December 16, 1998. On July 3, 1999, the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation from 1999-2004 was approved, and it entrusted the responsibility of implementing the TAGP to the ASEAN council on Petroleum (ASCOPE). In 2002, the final MOU on gas pipeline projects across ASEAN was signed by its member states.
The objective of the gas pipeline project is to provide a broad framework for ASEAN member countries to cooperate towards the realization of the TAGP project to help ensure greater regional energy security.
The MOU for gas pipeline projects task all member countries to establish cooperation in various aspects such as individual and joint studies, and to support or encourage the production, utilization, distribution, marketing and sale of natural gas among ASEAN member nations.
Pamalakaya said ASEAN nations have virtually opened the floodgates for economic plunder by big gas and oil monopolies when it announced that funding would be secured from the private sector that has the means and technology to explore and extract the rich gas resources still abundant in Southeast Asian region.
“It is a sell out. In fact, this corporate prey was probably used by the Philippine government to sign the JMSU and sold its stake in the disputed Spratly Islands, including its own territory like Palawan, which is incidentally the object of the Palawan-Malaysia gas pipeline project,” the militant group said.
The agreement also recognizes the role to be played by the private sector in developing gas pipelines, including its financing and construction, and the supply, transportation and distribution of natural gas to member countries. The TAGP promotes the open access principle including management of pipelines according to internationally accepted rules as set by established oil and gas industries all over the world.
The MoU on TAGP also encourage exemption of export and import tax duties, lower or free transit fee, tax duties or other taxes imposed by the government, including charges on construction, operation and maintenance of pipelines as well as the natural gas in transit.#
GMA is Beijing’s latest political social climber, says leftist group
“There’s no doubt, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo is Beijing’s latest political social climber,” the leftwing fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) said after learning that the President shared a table during lunch yesterday with four of the five members of the United Nations Security Council.
“The very insecure Mrs. Arroyo made it sure that she will be seated with the star studded cast of world leaders known for either oppressing their people or leading their respective countries to chaotic rule and economic depression,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
Hicap added: “Although she belongs to the same league and she is not miscast, still as far as world people are concerned, she remains a political bit player and the no.1 Girl Friday of US terror President George W. Bush.”
Malacañang media officer Saul Pa-a said President Arroyo sat with US President Bush, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Chinese President Hu Jintao who hosted lunch to welcome the world leaders to the staging of Olympic Games in China’s premiere capital.
Pa-a said President Arroyo was the sixth person to Hu’s left and the third head of state from the Chinese President. The five persons between Arroyo and Hu are Hu’s wife Madame Liu Xongqing, Countess An Rogge, spouse of International Olympic Committee President Jacques Rogge, Russian Prime Minister Putin, honorary IOC President Juan Antonio Samaranch and First Gentleman Atty. Jose Miguel Arroyo.
To Arroyo’s left were Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jicchi and Japanese Prime Minister Fukuda Yasuo and his spouse. The Palace media man said the lunch table, which sat 26 people had Bush and his wife Laura to the right of the Chinese President after IOC President Rogge.
“Does Malacañang believe that Mrs. Arroyo having photographed with Bush, Jintao, Sarkozy and Putin would change the negative ratings of the President from negative 38 to positive 38? The purpose of this Palace report regarding this seating escapade of Mrs. Arroyo with the world leaders is meant for political publicity, nothing more, nothing less,” Pamalakaya’s Hicap added.
Earlier, Pamalakaya said the visit of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in Beijing, was meant to bring the good news to the Chinese government that the Philippine Congress agreed to remove the country’s claim to f Kalayaan Group of Islands incorporated in the proposed the baselines bill that would determine the country’s territorial waters.
The group said with the dropping of Spratlys in the baselines bills, the stalled Joint Marine Seismic Undertaking (JMSU) which it signed with China and Vietnam to conduct offshore mining in the Spratly group of islands is primed for revival before the end of this year.
“The non-inclusion of Spratlys in the baselines bill and the mysterious visit of President Arroyo to China, using her Beijing Olympics stint as political passage to reach top leaders of China are clear proofs that the controversial oil exploration under the JMSU project will go full blast in the very near future,” Pamalakaya said. #
Militants fear revival of Spratly offshore deal with GMA’s Beijing stint, Kalayaan removal from baselines bill
THE MILITANT FISHERFOLK ALLIANCE Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) said the visit of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in Beijing, China and the removal of Kalayaan Group of Islands in the baselines bill are indications that the government will push through with Joint Marine Seismic Undertaking (JMSU) which it signed with China and Vietnam to conduct offshore mining in the Spratly group of islands.
“The non-inclusion of Spratlys in the baselines bill and the mysterious visit of President Arroyo to China, using her Beijing Olympics stint as political passage to reach top leaders of China are clear proofs that the controversial oil exploration under the JMSU project will go full blast in the very near future,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.
The Pamalakaya leader said one of the main purposes of the Mrs. Arroyo’s visit to Beijing is top inform top officials of the Chinese government that her government has decided to drop the country’s claim to Kalayaan group of islands as prescribed in the defanged baselines bill.
“With the removal of Spratlys in the baselines bill, it is now all system for China to conduct the biggest oil hunt in recent history courtesy of the corrupt and commission obsessed regime of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo,” Hicap added.
Pamalakaya recalled that sometime in March this year, Antonio Calilao, president of the state-owned Philippine National Oil Company (PNOC) has admitted that the entire 142,886 square kilometer area covered by the controversial JMSU among the Philippines, China and Vietnam are all within Philippine territory.
Calilao said JMSU as a purely commercial agreement has a precedent citing the joint Australian-Philippine cooperation, the joint Norwegian-Philippine cooperation, stressing that involvement of other nationalities in such undertaking is a very common practice here.
Pamalakaya asserted that the Philippine territory has been offered to the altar of the corporate great rush for energy resources in exchange for $ 8-billion loan from China. Such loan, the group said, would be treated as central fund of Malacañang for graft and corruption purposes.
The projects linked to the JMSU deal include the $329-million National Broadband Network (NBN) deal and other Chinese funded projects checkered with allegations of corruption and high irregularities like the Northrail project, South Rail project and Cyber Education project of the Department of Education (DepEd). Pamalakaya assailed the government’s plan to continue the second phase of JMSU despite controversies hounding the project ranging from the issue of territorial integrity, national sovereignty and graft and corruption.
Trans-ASEAN gas pipeline agreement
In a related development, Pamalakaya revealed that the Arroyo government signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on the Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipeline (TAGP) with Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam that would allow the construction of an ambitious gas pipeline from Palawan to East Natuna, Sabah, Malaysia.
Pamalakaya said the gas pipeline project that would link the Philippines through Palawan and Malaysia through East Natuna in Sabah, Malaysia was the product of the MoU on the ASEAN wide gas pipeline project.
The militant group said the Palawan-Malaysia gas pipeline project will go as far as 1,540 kilometers, with the gas pipeline measuring 42 inches in diameter. The cost of the gas line project between the Philippines and Malaysia would amount to $ 3.036 B. The project would start this year and would be completed in 2015.
Pamalakaya said other pipelines to be constructed are the Malaysia-Thailand gas pipeline, the Indonesia-Singapore gas pipeline and the Myanmar-Thailand gas pipeline. Hicap said Singapore is also eying its own gas pipeline that would connect the Philippines through the Camago in Palawan.
Confidential project
“Nothing has been said about this ambitious gas pipeline project. It remains a national confidential project on the part of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. The people were kept uninformed and Congress has not been advised that such monumental project exists that has serious implications to the nation’s sovereignty and patrimony,” Pamalakaya said.
The group added:” If there’s nothing wrong about this project, why would President Arroyo keep this project like a big, big secret? We smell something fishy here, as fishy as JMSU.”
According to the eight-page MoU document obtained by Pamalakaya, the agreement was signed on July 5, 2002 in Bali, Indonesia by Abdul Rahman Taib, Brunei’s Minister of Industry and Primary Resources, Suy Sem, Cambodian Minister for Industry, Mines and Energy, Purnomo Yusgiantoro, Indonesian Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Nam Viyaketh, Laos’ Deputy Minister of Industry and Handicraft, Leo Moggie, Malaysian Minister of Energy, Communications and Multimedia, Brig. General Lun Thi, Myanmar Minister of Energy, Raymond Lim Siang Keat, Singapore Minister of Foreign Affairs, Phongthep Thepkanjana, Minister to the Prime Minister office of Thailand, Dang Vu Chu, Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and former Department of Energy secretary Vincent Perez Jr. for the Philippine government.
The MOU states, “Realizing that energy self-sufficiency can be achieved through national and multinational efforts geared towards indigenous energy resource exploration, development, exploitation, distribution and transportation, and undertaken in a manner that both conserves the resources and preserves the environment and human habitat.”
The MOU, which is consistent with the vision of the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) countries to promote energy cooperation in the region, was first tackled on June 24, 1986 in Manila when members of ASEAN forged an agreement on energy cooperation, followed by the ASEAN Energy Cooperation in Bangkok on Dec. 15, 1995.
The TAGP is a specific energy program approved in Hanoi, Vietnam and was endorsed by ASEAN heads of state December 16, 1998. On July 3, 1999, the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation from 1999-2004 was approved, and it entrusted the responsibility of implementing the TAGP to the ASEAN council on Petroleum (ASCOPE). In 2002, the final MOU on gas pipeline projects across ASEAN was signed by its member states.
The objective of the gas pipeline project is to provide a broad framework for ASEAN member countries to cooperate towards the realization of the TAGP project to help ensure greater regional energy security.
The MOU for gas pipeline projects task all member countries to establish cooperation in various aspects such as individual and joint studies, and to support or encourage the production, utilization, distribution, marketing and sale of natural gas among ASEAN member nations.
Floodgates for economic plunder
Pamalakaya said ASEAN nations have virtually opened the floodgates for economic plunder by big gas and oil monopolies when it announced that funding would be secured from the private sector that has the means and technology to explore and extract the rich gas resources still abundant in Southeast Asian region.
“It is a sell out. In fact, this corporate prey was probably used by the Philippine government to sign the JMSU and sold its stake in the disputed Spratly Islands, including its own territory like Palawan, which is incidentally the object of the Palawan-Malaysia gas pipeline project,” the militant group said.
The agreement also recognizes the role to be played by the private sector in developing gas pipelines, including its financing and construction, and the supply, transportation and distribution of natural gas to member countries. The TAGP promotes the open access principle including management of pipelines according to internationally accepted rules as set by established oil and gas industries all over the world.
The MoU on TAGP also encourage exemption of export and import tax duties, lower or free transit fee, tax duties or other taxes imposed by the government, including charges on construction, operation and maintenance of pipelines as well as the natural gas in transit.#